Conversation
We has dot com, we should use it.
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on updating the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
internal/resend/src/client.tsx (3)
51-51: LGTM: Email domain updated as intended. Consider addressing the TODO comment.The
fromemail address has been correctly updated to use the new dot com domain. This change aligns with the PR objective.However, there's a TODO comment above this method suggesting it might be deprecated and unused. Consider removing this method if it's no longer needed to keep the codebase clean.
Line range hint
16-16: Consider updating thereplyToemail address.For consistency with the changes made to the
fromemail addresses, consider updating thereplyToemail address to use the new dot com domain as well.Suggested change:
- private readonly replyTo = "support@unkey.dev"; + private readonly replyTo = "support@unkey.com";
Line range hint
11-11: Consider renaming theResendclass for clarity.The class name
Resendmight be confusing as it's not directly related to resending emails. Consider using a more descriptive name that reflects its purpose, such asEmailServiceorUnkeyEmailClient.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- internal/resend/src/client.tsx (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
internal/resend/src/client.tsx (4)
27-27: LGTM: Email domain updated as intended.The
fromemail address has been correctly updated to use the new dot com domain. This change aligns with the PR objective and doesn't affect the method's functionality.
72-72: LGTM: Email domain updated as intended.The
fromemail address has been correctly updated to use the new dot com domain. This change aligns with the PR objective and doesn't affect the method's functionality.
96-96: LGTM: Email domain updated as intended.The
fromemail address has been correctly updated to use the new dot com domain. This change aligns with the PR objective and doesn't affect the method's functionality.
121-121: LGTM: Email domain updated as intended.The
fromemail address has been correctly updated to use the new dot com domain. This change aligns with the PR objective and doesn't affect the method's functionality.
* Update to dot com We has dot com, we should use it. * [autofix.ci] apply automated fixes --------- Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update to dot com We has dot com, we should use it. * [autofix.ci] apply automated fixes --------- Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
1 participant
We has dot com, we should use it.
What does this PR do?
Fixes # (issue)
If there is not an issue for this, please create one first. This is used to tracking purposes and also helps use understand why this PR exists
Type of change
How should this be tested?
Checklist
Required
pnpm buildpnpm fmtconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated
Summary by CodeRabbit