CLDR-17483 add lld Ladin locale

[DavidLRowe]

CLDR-17483

• This PR completes the ticket.

This PR adds lld base locale; ticket asks for additional variants to be added.

ALLOW_MANY_COMMITS=true

[DavidLRowe]

@srl295 Can you tell me why this failed? In the log, I see:
Error: (TestCoverageLevel.java:1282) Error: : Language subtags that are in a CLDR locale's ID are in root (1): expected "", got "lld"

[srl295]

@srl295 Can you tell me why this failed? In the log, I see:

Error: (TestCoverageLevel.java:1282) Error: : Language subtags that are in a CLDR locale's ID are in root (1): expected "", got "lld"

No idea. Files look good and we need a separate ticket to fix the error message, I can't make sense of it. @macchiati ?

[srl295]

Update: it was just attributeValueValidity.xml - and an unclear message. Filed CLDR-16818 to fix message. and updated the xml here

still failing check

[DavidLRowe]

build fails with:

Error:  (TestCoverageLevel.java:801)  Error: Comprehensive & no exception for path =>	//ldml/localeDisplayNames/languages/language[@type="lld"]

Any advice?

[srl295]

build fails with:

Error:  (TestCoverageLevel.java:801)  Error: Comprehensive & no exception for path =>	//ldml/localeDisplayNames/languages/language[@type="lld"]

Any advice?

Looks like it needs to be added to https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/blob/main/tools/cldr-code/src/test/java/org/unicode/cldr/unittest/TestCoverageLevel.java#L527

I reviewed that line with "need to revisit next time" - can you collect a ticket with the issues found in adding a locale? it seems like we may have actually regressed.

[srl295]

@DavidLRowe see if that does it

[srl295]

@macchiati what's the purpose of this list? (not clear from #3230 / CLDR-17042 )

[DavidLRowe]

So additional changes were needed to
common/supplemental/attributeValueValidity.xml
and
tools/cldr-code/src/test/java/org/unicode/cldr/unittest/TestCoverageLevel.java
in order to pass the tests.

Should this information be added to the procedure document? Or are you saying that something else should change so that these additions are not needed?

[srl295]

So additional changes were needed to common/supplemental/attributeValueValidity.xml and tools/cldr-code/src/test/java/org/unicode/cldr/unittest/TestCoverageLevel.java in order to pass the tests.

Should this information be added to the procedure document? Or are you saying that something else should change so that these additions are not needed?

Add it to the doc for now, but I think it's a bug. I'd recommend opening an issue tracking these two changes so they can be fixed.