book(lavalink): sync TLS docs with gateway#2105
Merged
spring4175 merged 3 commits intonextfrom Feb 4, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Erk-
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2023
Member
Erk-
left a comment
Erk-
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a small nit otherwise it looks good
Co-authored-by: Erk <Erk-@users.noreply.github.com>
spring4175
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The book's TLS docs for Twilight-lavalink incorrectly mention
async-tungsteniteas the WebSocket library instead oftokio-tungstenite. This PR, like #1982 for the gateway, corrects this. Additionally I removed the mention of the gateway's metric feature (removed in #1993).Split out of #2090