-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
Bump LLVM version to llvm/llvm-project@49af650 #2570
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+6
−3
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| 49af6502c6dcb4a7f7520178bd14df396f78240c |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ def get_llvm_package_info(): | |
| return Package("llvm", "LLVM-C.lib", "", "LLVM_INCLUDE_DIRS", "LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR", "LLVM_SYSPATH") | ||
| # use_assert_enabled_llvm = check_env_flag("TRITON_USE_ASSERT_ENABLED_LLVM", "False") | ||
| # release_suffix = "assert" if use_assert_enabled_llvm else "release" | ||
| rev = "b1115f8c" | ||
| rev = "49af6502" | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can we read the value in llvm-hash.txt? (And update the README.md that currently points here?) |
||
| name = f"llvm-{rev}-{system_suffix}" | ||
| url = f"https://tritonlang.blob.core.windows.net/llvm-builds/{name}.tar.gz" | ||
| return Package("llvm", name, url, "LLVM_INCLUDE_DIRS", "LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR", "LLVM_SYSPATH") | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To avoid polluting the top-level directory, could we put this in the cmake directory? (Perhaps that should be renamed to
build.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both comments make sense to me. But I think it would be best to do those in a separate PR, since updating the LLVM version itself is quite orthogonal from the process for doing it, and would require modifying the build system in several unrelated locations. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gflegar did you get around to making these changes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@karupayun should get to it next week.