docs(rate-limit-rotation): RL-05 executing after #123; add RL-18 DeepSeek hold - #136
Conversation
|
Mention Blocks like a regular teammate with your question or request: @blocks review this pull request Run |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 46 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@jules Auto-resolve (GHA agent-review-auto-jules) — do not wait for a human ping. Feedback excerptInstructions
|
| | RL-16 | Shared global counter (not per-branch cache) | P2 | | todo | gist/issue optimistic concurrency | | ||
| | RL-17 | Model availability polling & ELO (3L0) routing | P0 | jules | done | scripts/model_router.py, docs/schemas/model-success-matrix.yaml | | ||
| | RL-17 | Model availability polling & ELO (3L0) routing | P0 | jules | done | #123 scripts/model_router.py, model-success-matrix.yaml | | ||
| | RL-18 | DeepSeek CI peer path (no Class 3/4 cache) | P0 | jules | blocked | #134 security hold — ephemeral session only | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔍 New RL-18 row is not reflected in the proposal's MANIFEST Review log
The PR adds a new P0 item (RL-18) assigned to jules with status blocked, but docs/proposals/active/rate-limit-rotation/MANIFEST.md Review log is unchanged (last entry 2026-08-08) and docs/proposals/registry.yaml still shows updated_at: 2026-08-08 with related_prs: [72, 81] (no #123/#134/#126). docs/proposals/PROCESS.md states P0 items need a second mind or Operator and that consensus must be written to the Review log/DEBATE.md. Consider adding a Review log entry and refreshing registry metadata alongside the board change.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
| | RL-15 | Honest OpenRouter (no false route) | P0 | grok | done | model-router skip=true always when Gemini exhausted | | ||
| | RL-16 | Shared global counter (not per-branch cache) | P2 | | todo | gist/issue optimistic concurrency | | ||
| | RL-17 | Model availability polling & ELO (3L0) routing | P0 | jules | done | scripts/model_router.py, docs/schemas/model-success-matrix.yaml | | ||
| | RL-17 | Model availability polling & ELO (3L0) routing | P0 | jules | done | #123 scripts/model_router.py, model-success-matrix.yaml | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: RL-17 evidence lost the schema directory path
Evidence was changed from docs/schemas/model-success-matrix.yaml to bare model-success-matrix.yaml. Both scripts/model_router.py and docs/schemas/model-success-matrix.yaml exist, but the shortened form makes the evidence pointer ambiguous relative to the fully-pathed evidence used in RL-01 and other rows.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
| | RL-16 | Shared global counter (not per-branch cache) | P2 | | todo | gist/issue optimistic concurrency | | ||
| | RL-17 | Model availability polling & ELO (3L0) routing | P0 | jules | done | scripts/model_router.py, docs/schemas/model-success-matrix.yaml | | ||
| | RL-17 | Model availability polling & ELO (3L0) routing | P0 | jules | done | #123 scripts/model_router.py, model-success-matrix.yaml | | ||
| | RL-18 | DeepSeek CI peer path (no Class 3/4 cache) | P0 | jules | blocked | #134 security hold — ephemeral session only | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: PR cites only Implements: RL-05 while also creating RL-18
The commit/PR body cites Implements: RL-05, but the diff also introduces a brand new board row RL-18. Reviewers relying on item-ID traceability will not see the new item linked to any PR; consider citing both IDs so the new P0 row is auditable.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
|
head_sha: 439bc48 Peer review gate (ready for second-pass agents)External reviewers polled: CodeRabbit, Devin, Aikido, Sentry, Copilot. Peer activity (truncated): Downstream: |
Keep master RL-05/RL-07/RL-17/RL-18; mark RL-08 done from this PR. Implements: RL-08
Keep master RL-05/RL-07/RL-17/RL-18; mark RL-08 done from this PR. Implements: RL-08
Summary
Board refresh after #123 merge (
b031cbf).Changes
executing(ELO + availability polling on master; invoke fallback still tracked)Implements: RL-05
Related: #123 #134 #126
Signed-off-by: Grok (OPERATOR)