-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
[SE-0481] Allow weak let and make weak captures immutable #80440
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SE-0481] Allow weak let and make weak captures immutable #80440
Conversation
67d465f to
b1ba6f3
Compare
b1ba6f3 to
83a0a48
Compare
83a0a48 to
f10e0a6
Compare
|
@swift-ci Please build toolchain |
|
@swift-ci Please build macOS toolchain |
3b38a25 to
3e0de86
Compare
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test |
Remaining failures: DebugInfo/guard-let-scope4.swift expr/closure/closures.swift SILGen/capture-transitive.swift SILGen/dynamic_self.swift SILGen/unowned-class-bound-generic-parameter.swift
…le weak capture (minor source-breaking change)
Remaining failures: SILGen/unowned-class-bound-generic-parameter.swift
|
@swift-ci Please clean smoke test macOS platform |
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test Linux platform |
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test Windows platform |
|
@swift-ci Please test macOS platform |
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test macOS platform |
1 similar comment
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test macOS platform |
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test Windows platform |
|
Tests fail on Windows in fails because some of the error messages differ in diagnostic spelling |
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test |
rjmccall
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR title is wrong, since you're not adding an experimental feature anymore. It should probably refer to SE-0481.
hamishknight
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implicit self diagnostic changes LGTM!
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test |
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test macOS platform |
rjmccall
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
@nickolas-pohilets Please refrain from merging PRs containing merge commits. They unnecessarily convolute the history and — as you may have discovered — make it considerably more painful to move changes across branches. |
…re semantics still wrapped into a feature See swiftlang#80440 and swiftlang#82732
Changes were originally wrapped into experimental feature, but after proposal was approved, feature was removed and PR applies changes unconditionally.