feat: tailwindcss plugins

[manuel3108]

Closes #27

Untested and with a type error, but i need to leave.
Ignored the icon plugin, since there seems to be some discrepancies in the issue.

To discuss: We recently removed the name property from the adder. Should we do the same here and only display the id?

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a329f52

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
sv	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in Stackblitz

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/sveltejs/cli/sv@127

commit: a329f52

[benmccann]

To discuss: We recently removed the name property from the adder. Should we do the same here and only display the id?

I think so. It helps show which ones are officially maintained by the Tailwind org and which are third-party

[AdrianGonz97]

are you suggesting that we should show their npm package names instead?
ex:

◆  Which plugins would you like to add?
│  ◻ @tailwindcss/typography
│  ◻ @tailwindcss/forms
│  ◻ @tailwindcss/container-queries
│  ◻ @tailwindcss/aspect-ratio
└

as opposed too...

◆  Which plugins would you like to add?
│  ◻ Typography
│  ◻ Forms
│  ◻ Container queries
│  ◻ Aspect ratio
└

[AdrianGonz97]

removing the name prop ended up being nicer. i'm also playing around with adding the npm package name as a hint as well:

thoughts?

[benmccann]

That screenshot looks nice