simplify trait bounds as Read/Write-BytesExt#2
Closed
zancas wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Author
|
This is superceded by: |
str4d
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2019
CryptoForge
referenced
this pull request
in CryptoForge/librustzcash
Mar 3, 2019
Do not perform inversions when converting from montgomery to edwards
CryptoForge
referenced
this pull request
in CryptoForge/librustzcash
Mar 3, 2019
Add sapling-crypto to dependencies
str4d
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2021
…dularization ZIP-225/244 #2: Refactor transaction builder to create separate builders for each section.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hiya! I didn't want to to wait for the data movement PR to resolve. I think this one is fairly simple, but I don't know Rust very well, and may be overlooking something.. if my understanding is correct, then this change makes the code a little more readable.