Add native Korean localization support

[Yuxin-Qiao]

Summary

Adds Korean (ko) as a first-class app localization.

Changes

• Add ko to the language picker.
• Add Sources/CodexBar/Resources/ko.lproj/Localizable.strings.
• Add language_korean labels in existing localization files so the new option is shown consistently in the language menu.
• Preserve existing localization fallback behavior.

Validation

• Confirmed key parity with en.lproj.
• Confirmed format placeholder parity (%@, %d, positional specifiers).
• Ran full test suite:

swift test -> 3197 tests passed.

[clawsweeper]

Codex review: needs real behavior proof before merge. Reviewed June 11, 2026, 1:33 PM ET / 17:33 UTC.

Summary
Review failed before ClawSweeper could summarize the requested change.

Reproducibility: unclear. The review failed before ClawSweeper could establish a reproduction path.

Review metrics: none identified.

Merge readiness
Overall: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Proof: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Patch quality: 🌊 off-meta tidepool
Result: rating does not apply to this item.

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality, so missing proof can cap an otherwise strong patch.

Risk before merge

• [P1] No close action taken because the review did not complete.

Maintainer options:

1. Decide the mitigation before merge
   Retry the Codex review after fixing the execution failure.
2. Pause or close
   Do not merge this PR until maintainers decide whether the risk is worth taking.

Next step before merge

• [P1] Review did not complete, so no work-lane recommendation was made.

Review details

Best possible solution:

Retry the Codex review after fixing the execution failure.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Unclear. The review failed before ClawSweeper could establish a reproduction path.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Unclear. Retry the review first so ClawSweeper can evaluate the actual issue and fix direction.

AGENTS.md: unclear because the file could not be read completely.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 3c2d23d1739a.

Label changes

Label changes:

• remove P2: Current review triage priority is none.
• remove merge-risk: 🚨 other: Current PR review selected no merge-risk labels.

Label justifications:

• rating: 🌊 off-meta tidepool: Overall readiness is 🌊 off-meta tidepool; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🌊 off-meta tidepool.

Evidence reviewed

What I checked:

• failure reason: retryable codex transport failure.
• codex failure detail: Codex review failed for this PR with exit 1.
• codex stderr: 1 06:35:12 +0100 48) }.
• codex stdout: No stdout captured.

Likely related people:

• unknown: Codex failed before it could trace repository history. (role: review did not complete; confidence: low)

What the crustacean ranks mean

• 🦀 challenger crab: rare, exceptional readiness with strong proof, clean implementation, and convincing validation.
• 🦞 diamond lobster: very strong readiness with only minor maintainer review expected.
• 🐚 platinum hermit: good normal PR, likely mergeable with ordinary maintainer review.
• 🦐 gold shrimp: useful signal, but proof or patch confidence is still limited.
• 🦪 silver shellfish: thin signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work.
• 🧂 unranked krab: not merge-ready because proof is missing/unusable or there are serious correctness or safety concerns.
• 🌊 off-meta tidepool: rating does not apply to this item.

Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

How this review workflow works

• ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
• Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
• A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
• PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
• Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
• Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
• Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
• Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 51aa5edf9e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Escape the placeholder quotes in Korean strings

The Korean Localizable.strings file is syntactically invalid because the translated value contains unescaped "%@" quotes. I checked this file with plutil -lint, which reports a missing semicolon at this line; as a result, the Korean localization table cannot be parsed when the new ko language is selected, and macOS/Xcode string resource validation may reject the resource. Escape these quotes (or use curly quotes) so the .strings file remains valid.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[Yuxin-Qiao]

Screenshots

@clawsweeper re-review

[clawsweeper]

🦞🧹
ClawSweeper re-review requested.

I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again.
Action: item re-review queued (workflow sweep.yml, event repository_dispatch).
Result: the existing ClawSweeper review comment will be edited in place when the review finishes.

Re-review progress:

• State: Complete
• Detail: The targeted re-review finished, the durable review comment was updated, and the synced verdict was routed.
• Run: https://github.com/openclaw/clawsweeper/actions/runs/26736402127
• Updated: 2026-06-01T05:17:29.374Z

[steipete]

Rebased and repaired this branch on current main at 88c43eeb; pushed head 95098043.

Proof:

• Korean catalog parity: 1038/1038 English keys
• fixed stale/missing keys and invalid escaped values
• fixed printf percent placeholders and added direct formatting regressions
• focused localization/preferences suite: 10 tests passed
• make check: passed
• autoreview: clean, confidence 0.84

I am holding merge for native-language review. The catalog still has clear user-visible machine-translation defects, including quota_warning_session = "이름 *", quota_warning_warn_at = "전쟁에서", and mixed-English depleted/stale labels. CI/parity can prove resource safety, but not Korean copy quality.

[steipete]

Superseded by #1460, which carries a native-contributor Korean catalog, full catalog/format regressions, and live menu/settings proof.

Thank you @Yuxin-Qiao for starting the Korean localization work and for the screenshots and follow-up repairs here. Closing this branch to keep one canonical implementation.