Skip to content

Conversation

@tk0miya
Copy link
Member

@tk0miya tk0miya commented Nov 16, 2019

Feature or Bugfix

  • Feature

Purpose

Remaining tasks

  • testing

@tk0miya tk0miya added type:enhancement enhance or introduce a new feature builder:latex labels Nov 16, 2019
@tk0miya tk0miya added this to the 2.3.0 milestone Nov 16, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 16, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (2.0@26cd301). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 58.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             2.0    #6838   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   83.78%           
======================================
  Files          ?      269           
  Lines          ?    41216           
  Branches       ?     6015           
======================================
  Hits           ?    34533           
  Misses         ?     5355           
  Partials       ?     1328
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
sphinx/writers/latex.py 81.78% <58.33%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 26cd301...72fa75c. Read the comment docs.

@tk0miya tk0miya modified the milestones: 2.3.0, 2.4.0 Dec 8, 2019
@tk0miya tk0miya marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2019 09:03
@tk0miya tk0miya changed the title WIP: Close #6837: LaTeX: Support a nested table Close #6837: LaTeX: Support a nested table Dec 22, 2019
@tk0miya tk0miya merged commit 716607f into sphinx-doc:2.0 Dec 22, 2019
@tk0miya tk0miya deleted the 6837_nested_table branch December 22, 2019 09:12
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

builder:latex type:enhancement enhance or introduce a new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant