This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2025. It is now read-only.
removes position field in coding-shred-header#17004
Merged
behzadnouri merged 1 commit intosolana-labs:masterfrom May 10, 2021
Merged
removes position field in coding-shred-header#17004behzadnouri merged 1 commit intosolana-labs:masterfrom
behzadnouri merged 1 commit intosolana-labs:masterfrom
Conversation
CodingShredHeader.position is equal to ShredCommonHeader.index - ShredCommonHeader.fec_set_index and is so redundant. The extra position field can add bugs if not consistent with index and fec_set_index.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #17004 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 82.8% 82.8%
=======================================
Files 416 416
Lines 116948 116946 -2
=======================================
+ Hits 96836 96838 +2
+ Misses 20112 20108 -4 |
carllin
approved these changes
May 3, 2021
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Checking the three places where the position field is used:
- https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/pull/17004/files#diff-01b72272fd1033dcbb8fed13821a6232d35913119af6be20a7c2d1e9c772feb9L1219
- https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/pull/17004/files#diff-01b72272fd1033dcbb8fed13821a6232d35913119af6be20a7c2d1e9c772feb9L1226
- https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/pull/17004/files#diff-01b72272fd1033dcbb8fed13821a6232d35913119af6be20a7c2d1e9c772feb9L1244
I think this should be safe to merge without any gating (i.e. it should be ok for a leader to broadcast position == 0 to validators who haven't upgraded to this change yet)
Thanks for the cleanup!
Contributor
|
@mvines and @sakridge, fyi saw this nice reminder on compatibility for upgrade/downgrade for mainnet release + master: #17136 (comment) (which I did not account for in @steviez's review, sorry!), and double checked this PR would not break that assumption, specifically the downgrade path. @behzadnouri and I discussed this critical change: https://solanalabs.slack.com/archives/D019TRTQMA7/p1620673230006800 and decided this change should be safe even for downgrade because the 3 places this change would be detected: #17004 (review), should become no-ops with |
behzadnouri
added a commit
to behzadnouri/solana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2021
solana-labs#17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, for upcoming changes to erasure coding schema we need this field to be populated.
behzadnouri
added a commit
to behzadnouri/solana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2021
solana-labs#17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, for upcoming changes to erasure coding schema we need this field to be populated.
behzadnouri
added a commit
to behzadnouri/solana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2021
solana-labs#17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, with upcoming changes to erasure coding schema this field will no longer be redundant and needs to be populated.
behzadnouri
added a commit
to behzadnouri/solana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2021
solana-labs#17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, with the upcoming changes to erasure coding schema this field will no longer be redundant and needs to be populated.
behzadnouri
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2021
#17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, with the upcoming changes to erasure coding schema this field will no longer be redundant and needs to be populated.
mergify Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2021
#17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, with the upcoming changes to erasure coding schema this field will no longer be redundant and needs to be populated. (cherry picked from commit cd17f63) # Conflicts: # core/src/window_service.rs # ledger/src/blockstore.rs # ledger/src/shred.rs
mergify Bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2021
#17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, with the upcoming changes to erasure coding schema this field will no longer be redundant and needs to be populated. (cherry picked from commit cd17f63) Co-authored-by: behzad nouri <behzadnouri@gmail.com>
mergify Bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2021
…1619) * adds back position field to coding-shred-header (#21600) #17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, with the upcoming changes to erasure coding schema this field will no longer be redundant and needs to be populated. (cherry picked from commit cd17f63) # Conflicts: # core/src/window_service.rs # ledger/src/blockstore.rs # ledger/src/shred.rs * removes backport merge conflicts Co-authored-by: behzad nouri <behzadnouri@gmail.com>
jbiseda
pushed a commit
to jbiseda/solana
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2021
solana-labs#17004 removed position field from coding-shred-header because as it stands the field is redundant and unused. However, with the upcoming changes to erasure coding schema this field will no longer be redundant and needs to be populated.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
CodingShredHeader.positionis equal toand is so redundant. The extra position field can add bugs if not
consistent with
indexandfec_set_index.Summary of Changes
Removed position field in coding-shred-header.