Minor fixes

[TatriX]

Hi!
I was readining a new version of the guide and noticed several possible minor issues.
I'll put proposed changes here.

[TatriX]

There are links to API docs in the text but

1. They point to outdated versions
2. Docs for 0.5 are missing.

[MartinKavik]

Docs for 0.5 are missing.

• Seed 0.5.0 todos seed#308
• Remove crate_type from cargo.toml + remove cargo.lock seed#306

[MartinKavik]

@TatriX

• Could you change
  

  seed-rs.org/.github/workflows/main.yml

  Line 3 in 7b25826

  on: [push]

  
  to on: [push, pull_request], please? It's OT, but it would be nice to have linters enabled for this and next PRs.
• Let us know, once this PR is ready for code review.

[TatriX]

Sure. Note that you can push to my branch with your own changes.

[David-OConnor]

Say when ready, and we'll merge this. These fixes are great.

[TatriX]

Sure, I'm slowly reading through the docs, so when I'll finish I'll leave a comment.
But you may squash and merge if you want.

[TatriX]

Ok, I think this PR can be squashed and merged.
It seems that deployed site is a bit different from master so I'll probably go through the text again in the future.

[MartinKavik]

It seems that deployed site is a bit different from master

It sounds like a bug, master should be deployed automatically. What's different?

[TatriX]

Hm, I can't see the difference anymore. Either some caching problem or just my misunderstanding.

fetch.md has an app.update(Msg::FetchData); in the first code example and it seems it's staled. Could you please take a look?

[MartinKavik]

fetch.md has an app.update(Msg::FetchData); in the first code example and it seems it's staled. Could you please take a look?

I don't see any differences. Maybe it's really a problem with cache.
Last deploys

• Dec 11 at 5.20 PM
• Dec 10 at 12.12 AM and 12.10 AM
• Dec 4, at 11.54 PM

If it works for you now, please create a new issue like "Implement cache busting" in quickstart-webpack repo.

[TatriX]

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. What I mean when I asked to take a look is that code example itself if staled.
It uses non-existing Msg::FetchData. It seems that it should be removed from the code and from the explanation.

[MartinKavik]

@TatriX Yeah, thanks for the explanation.
I think there is/will be more similar cases because I don't know how to check them during compilation - any ideas?

[TatriX]

Well, I would do that with help of org-mode + org-babel instead of markdown (or any other literate programming tool). This way all code can be compiled and thus checked. Though I'm not sure this is acceptable for our use case, because it will make contribution process harder.

[MartinKavik]

Some ideas here: #11. We should continue discussion in that issue.