Preserve incomplete WSL retrieval evidence and enforce provenance checks

[seathatflowsinourveins]

The September 20 WSL retrieval records lack complete retained command arguments, working directories, and raw-log provenance. Preserve them as incomplete historical reference, with their failed attempt and original executed runner bytes, without qualifying component adoption or a new host.

Enforce the exact frozen-input and expected-check sets so an omitted input or substituted successful check fails audit. Future captures retain sanitized arguments and working directories. The current QMD recipe enables dependency scripts and uses NODE_LLAMA_CPP_SKIP_DOWNLOAD=true; the historical install record remains unchanged.

Validation: 40 focused regression tests passed, with zero skips; all 13 recorded checks passed, covering the artifact audit, convergence, publication hashes, foundation, component matrix, generated explorer, lint and review gate. Hosted checks are required on the final commit before merge. These checks validate artifact contracts; they do not replay the historical native commands or establish fresh WSL runtime acceptance. No model, account, global pin, service, or host configuration changes.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-24T02:44:41.217660Z	ed6acc4	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[socket-security]

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff	Package	Supply Chain Security	Vulnerability	Quality	Maintenance	License
	npm/​sqlite-vec-linux-x64@​0.1.9
	npm/​@​tobilu/​qmd@​2.8.3

View full report

[socket-security]

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action	Severity	Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Warn		Obfuscated code: npm yargs is 90.0% likely obfuscated Confidence: 0.90 Location: Package overview From: blueprints/convergence-practice/wsl-retrieval/package-lock.json → npm/@tobilu/qmd@2.8.3 → npm/yargs@17.7.3 ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code? Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev. Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code. Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/yargs@17.7.3. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ed6acc48ff

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".