Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Skip::next for non-fused inner iterators #99434

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 19, 2022

Conversation

timvermeulen
Copy link
Contributor

iter.skip(n).next() will currently call nth and next in succession on iter, without checking whether nth exhausts the iterator. Using ? to propagate a None value returned by nth avoids this.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jul 18, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 18, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @scottmcm

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 18, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2022

📌 Commit e52837c has been approved by scottmcm

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 18, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
…=scottmcm

Fix `Skip::next` for non-fused inner iterators

`iter.skip(n).next()` will currently call `nth` and `next` in succession on `iter`, without checking whether `nth` exhausts the iterator. Using `?` to propagate a `None` value returned by `nth` avoids this.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#97183 (wf-check generators)
 - rust-lang#98320 (Mention first and last macro in backtrace)
 - rust-lang#99335 (Use split_once in FromStr docs)
 - rust-lang#99347 (Use `LocalDefId` in `OpaqueTypeKey`)
 - rust-lang#99392 (Fix debuginfo tests.)
 - rust-lang#99404 (Use span_bug for unexpected field projection type)
 - rust-lang#99410 (Update invalid atomic ordering lint)
 - rust-lang#99434 (Fix `Skip::next` for non-fused inner iterators)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e301cd3 into rust-lang:master Jul 19, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@timvermeulen timvermeulen deleted the skip_next_non_fused branch July 19, 2022 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants