Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update invalid atomic ordering lint #99410

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2022
Merged

Conversation

tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

@tmiasko tmiasko commented Jul 18, 2022

The restriction that success ordering must be at least as strong as its
failure ordering in compare-exchange operations was lifted in #98383.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jul 18, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @fee1-dead

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 18, 2022
The restriction that success ordering must be at least as strong as its
failure ordering in compare-exchange operations was lifted in rust-lang#98383.
@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2022

📌 Commit 45afc21 has been approved by fee1-dead

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 18, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2022
Update invalid atomic ordering lint

The restriction that success ordering must be at least as strong as its
failure ordering in compare-exchange operations was lifted in rust-lang#98383.
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Update invalid atomic ordering lint

The restriction that success ordering must be at least as strong as its
failure ordering in compare-exchange operations was lifted in rust-lang#98383.
This was referenced Jul 19, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#97183 (wf-check generators)
 - rust-lang#98320 (Mention first and last macro in backtrace)
 - rust-lang#99335 (Use split_once in FromStr docs)
 - rust-lang#99347 (Use `LocalDefId` in `OpaqueTypeKey`)
 - rust-lang#99392 (Fix debuginfo tests.)
 - rust-lang#99404 (Use span_bug for unexpected field projection type)
 - rust-lang#99410 (Update invalid atomic ordering lint)
 - rust-lang#99434 (Fix `Skip::next` for non-fused inner iterators)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 415f7e1 into rust-lang:master Jul 19, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmiasko commented Jul 19, 2022

Thanks for the quick review @fee1-dead!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants