Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #98480

Closed
wants to merge 34 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

ChrisDenton and others added 30 commits April 26, 2022 00:13
This will allow better strategies for use of memory and File handles. However, fully taking advantage of that is left to future work.
It's possible that a file in the directory is pending deletion. In that case we might succeed after a few attempts.
rust-lang#91318 introduced a trait for infallible folders distinct from the fallible version.  For some reason (completely unfathomable to me now that I look at it with fresh eyes), the infallible trait was a supertrait of the fallible one: that is, all fallible folders were required to also be infallible.  Moreover the `Error` associated type was defined on the infallible trait!  It's so absurd that it has me questioning whether I was entirely sane.

This trait reverses the hierarchy, so that the fallible trait is a supertrait of the infallible one: all infallible folders are required to also be fallible (which is a trivial blanket implementation).  This of course makes much more sense!  It also enables the `Error` associated type to sit on the fallible trait, where it sensibly belongs.

There is one downside however: folders expose a `tcx` accessor method.  Since the blanket fallible implementation for infallible folders only has access to a generic `F: TypeFolder`, we need that trait to expose such an accessor to which we can delegate.  Alternatively it's possible to extract that accessor into a separate `HasTcx` trait (or similar) that would then be a supertrait of both the fallible and infallible folder traits: this would ensure that there's only one unambiguous `tcx` method, at the cost of a little additional boilerplate.  If desired, I can submit that as a separate PR.

r? @jackh726
Co-authored-by: Wesley Wiser <[email protected]>
Windows: Iterative `remove_dir_all`

This will allow better strategies for use of memory and File handles. However, fully taking advantage of that is left to future work.

Note to reviewer: It's probably best to view the `remove_dir_all_recursive` as a new function. The diff is not very helpful (imho).
Add a test for issue rust-lang#33172

Adds a test confirming that rust-lang#33172 has been fixed.

CDB has some surprising results as it looks like the supposedly unmangled static's symbol name is prefixed when it shouldn't be.

r? ```@wesleywiser```

Closes rust-lang#33172
Pull Derefer before ElaborateDrops

_Follow up work to rust-lang#97025 rust-lang#96549 rust-lang#96116 rust-lang#95887 #95649_

This moves `Derefer` before `ElaborateDrops` and creates a new `Rvalue` called `VirtualRef` that allows us to bypass many constraints for `DerefTemp`.

r? ``@oli-obk``
…nkov

Set relocation_model to Pic on emscripten target

So we can support dynamically linking libraries with Emscripten (otherwise we need to use nightly and `-Zbuild-std` to rebuild std with relocations).
```@sbc100```
…bank

Fix trait object reborrow suggestion

Fixes rust-lang#93596

Slightly generalizes the logic we use to suggest fix first implemented in rust-lang#95609, specifically when we have a `Sized` obligation that comes from a struct's unsized tail.
…notriddle

Transform help popup into a pocket menu

Just like we moved the settings menu into a "pocket menu", it's doing the same to the help popup.

You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/help-pocket-menu/doc/foo/index.html) and here is a screenshot:

![Screenshot from 2022-06-20 20-58-29](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/174663718-538e9d11-3bf9-48b2-8909-f9bfe75af135.png)

r? ```@jsha```
…jackh726

Reverse folder hierarchy

rust-lang#91318 introduced a trait for infallible folders distinct from the fallible version.  For some reason (completely unfathomable to me now that I look at it with fresh eyes), the infallible trait was a supertrait of the fallible one: that is, all fallible folders were required to also be infallible.  Moreover the `Error` associated type was defined on the infallible trait!  It's so absurd that it has me questioning whether I was entirely sane.

This trait reverses the hierarchy, so that the fallible trait is a supertrait of the infallible one: all infallible folders are required to also be fallible (which is a trivial blanket implementation).  This of course makes much more sense!  It also enables the `Error` associated type to sit on the fallible trait, where it sensibly belongs.

There is one downside however: folders expose a `tcx` accessor method.  Since the blanket fallible implementation for infallible folders only has access to a generic `F: TypeFolder`, we need that trait to expose such an accessor to which we can delegate.  Alternatively it's possible to extract that accessor into a separate `HasTcx` trait (or similar) that would then be a supertrait of both the fallible and infallible folder traits: this would ensure that there's only one unambiguous `tcx` method, at the cost of a little additional boilerplate.  If desired, I can submit that as a separate PR.

r? ``@jackh726``
…ing, r=oli-obk

Fix printing `impl trait` under binders

Before, we would render `impl for<'a> Trait<'a>` like `impl Trait<for<'a> 'a>`, lol.
…nant-cast, r=lcnr

Use correct substs in enum discriminant cast

Fixes rust-lang#97634

r? ``@lcnr``
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 25, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 25, 2022

📌 Commit a80dffb has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 25, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 25, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a80dffb with merge 3c0b4645b095f09b5a8a5e80c31270d702951bf6...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-distcheck failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
test [debuginfo-gdb] src/test/debuginfo/cross-crate-type-uniquing.rs ... ok

failures:

---- [debuginfo-gdb] src/test/debuginfo/no_mangle-info.rs stdout ----
NOTE: compiletest thinks it is using GDB without native rust support
NOTE: compiletest thinks it is using GDB version 7011001
error: line not found in debugger output: $2 = 42
status: exit status: 0
status: exit status: 0
command: "/usr/bin/gdb" "-quiet" "-batch" "-nx" "-command=/checkout/obj/build/tmp/distcheck/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/debuginfo/no_mangle-info.gdb/no_mangle-info.debugger.script"
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.11.1-0ubuntu1~16.5) 7.11.1
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.
For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word".
Breakpoint 1 at 0xbbd: file src/test/debuginfo/no_mangle-info.rs, line 38.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".


Breakpoint 1, no_mangle_info::main::hb3b9c5efc50504a9 () at src/test/debuginfo/no_mangle-info.rs:38
38     println!("OTHER TEST: {}", namespace::OTHER_TEST); // #break
------------------------------------------
--- stderr -------------------------------
--- stderr -------------------------------
/checkout/obj/build/tmp/distcheck/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/debuginfo/no_mangle-info.gdb/no_mangle-info.debugger.script:11: Error in sourced command file:
No type "namespace" within class or namespace "no_mangle_info".



failures:
failures:
    [debuginfo-gdb] src/test/debuginfo/no_mangle-info.rs

test result: FAILED. 85 passed; 1 failed; 54 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 4.48s

Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:18:18
make: *** [check] Error 1
Makefile:42: recipe for target 'check' failed

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 25, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 25, 2022
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Failed by #97085, closing.

@JohnTitor JohnTitor closed this Jun 25, 2022
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC deleted the rollup-gocmstk branch June 25, 2022 09:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.