-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use the first codegen backend in the config.toml as default #94415
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bjorn3
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
A-gcc
Things relevant to the [future] GCC backend
labels
Feb 27, 2022
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Feb 27, 2022
It is currently hard coded to llvm if enabled and cranelift otherwise. This made some sense when cranelift was the only alternative codegen backend. Since the introduction of the gcc backend this doesn't make much sense anymore. Before this PR bootstrapping rustc using a backend other than llvm or cranelift required changing the source of rustc_interface. With this PR it becomes a matter of putting the right backend as first enabled backend in config.toml.
bjorn3
force-pushed
the
cfg_default_backend
branch
from
February 27, 2022 10:28
734822f
to
7ad4297
Compare
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 7ad4297 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 27, 2022
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2022
…Simulacrum Use the first codegen backend in the config.toml as default It is currently hard coded to llvm if enabled and cranelift otherwise. This made some sense when cranelift was the only alternative codegen backend. Since the introduction of the gcc backend this doesn't make much sense anymore. Before this PR bootstrapping rustc using a backend other than llvm or cranelift required changing the source of rustc_interface. With this PR it becomes a matter of putting the right backend as first enabled backend in config.toml. cc `@antoyo`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2022
…Simulacrum Use the first codegen backend in the config.toml as default It is currently hard coded to llvm if enabled and cranelift otherwise. This made some sense when cranelift was the only alternative codegen backend. Since the introduction of the gcc backend this doesn't make much sense anymore. Before this PR bootstrapping rustc using a backend other than llvm or cranelift required changing the source of rustc_interface. With this PR it becomes a matter of putting the right backend as first enabled backend in config.toml. cc ``@antoyo``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#94396 (1 - Make more use of `let_chains`) - rust-lang#94397 (Document that pre-expansion lint passes are softly deprecated) - rust-lang#94399 (Add test for rust-lang#79465 to prevent regression) - rust-lang#94409 (avoid rebuilding bootstrap when PATH changes) - rust-lang#94415 (Use the first codegen backend in the config.toml as default) - rust-lang#94417 (Fix duplicated impl links) - rust-lang#94420 (3 - Make more use of `let_chains`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-gcc
Things relevant to the [future] GCC backend
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It is currently hard coded to llvm if enabled and cranelift otherwise.
This made some sense when cranelift was the only alternative codegen
backend. Since the introduction of the gcc backend this doesn't make
much sense anymore. Before this PR bootstrapping rustc using a backend
other than llvm or cranelift required changing the source of
rustc_interface. With this PR it becomes a matter of putting the right
backend as first enabled backend in config.toml.
cc @antoyo