-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add long error explanation for E0227 #92351
Conversation
Some changes occurred in diagnostic error codes |
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @petrochenkov (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
||
To resolve this error, provide an explicit lifetime: | ||
|
||
```rust |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: You don't need to add rust
, it's the default. It's not a blocker for the PR though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's nice to have syntax highlighting in vim while editing .md
files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Like I said, not a blocker. We generally don't add it but it's fine to have it here.
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | |||
This error indicates that the compiler is unable to determine whether there is |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We try to provide a small description of the error first, and then provide more explanations after the erroneous code example. However in this case I'm not sure how to word it... If you have an idea, please go for it, otherwise I'll just approve as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, the only reason why I haven't included a small description is because I can't think of one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then it's fine. I'll approve the PR once the CI passed. Thanks for working on this!
@bors: r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 406d6d4 has been approved by |
…askrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#92075 (rustdoc: Only special case struct fields for intra-doc links, not enum variants) - rust-lang#92118 (Parse and suggest moving where clauses after equals for type aliases) - rust-lang#92237 (Visit expressions in-order when resolving pattern bindings) - rust-lang#92340 (rustdoc: Start cleaning up search index generation) - rust-lang#92351 (Add long error explanation for E0227) - rust-lang#92371 (Remove pretty printer space inside block with only outer attrs) - rust-lang#92372 (Print space after formal generic params in fn type) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Part of the #61137.