Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments #79177

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2020

Conversation

fanzier
Copy link
Contributor

@fanzier fanzier commented Nov 18, 2020

Add a test that checks whether the drop order of let bindings is consistent with the drop order of the corresponding destructuring assignments.

Thanks to @RalfJung for the suggesting this test (here) and an implementation!

r? @RalfJung

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 18, 2020
@jyn514 jyn514 added the A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc label Nov 18, 2020
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 19, 2020

📌 Commit 1094f97 has been approved by RalfJung

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 19, 2020
@varkor varkor added the F-destructuring_assignment `#![feature(destructuring_assignment)]` label Nov 19, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments

Add a test that checks whether the drop order of `let` bindings is consistent with the drop order of the corresponding destructuring assignments.

Thanks to `@RalfJung` for the suggesting this test ([here](rust-lang#79016 (comment))) and an implementation!

r? `@RalfJung`
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments

Add a test that checks whether the drop order of `let` bindings is consistent with the drop order of the corresponding destructuring assignments.

Thanks to ``@RalfJung`` for the suggesting this test ([here](rust-lang#79016 (comment))) and an implementation!

r? ``@RalfJung``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79119 (Clarify availability of atomic operations)
 - rust-lang#79123 (Add u128 and i128 integer tests)
 - rust-lang#79177 (Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments)
 - rust-lang#79181 (rustdoc: add [src] links to methods on a trait's page)
 - rust-lang#79183 (Make compiletest testing use the local sysroot)
 - rust-lang#79185 (expand/resolve: Pre-requisites to "Turn `#[derive]` into a regular macro attribute")
 - rust-lang#79193 (Revert rust-lang#78969 "Normalize function type during validation")
 - rust-lang#79194 (Make as{_mut,}_slice on array::IntoIter public)
 - rust-lang#79204 (Add jyn514 email alias to mailmap)
 - rust-lang#79212 (Move `rustc_ty` -> `rustc_ty_utils`)
 - rust-lang#79217 (Add the "memcpy" doc alias to slice::copy_from_slice)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit acc2e23 into rust-lang:master Nov 20, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Nov 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc F-destructuring_assignment `#![feature(destructuring_assignment)]` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants