-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
do not try fetching the ancestors of errored trait impls #74516
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jul 19, 2020
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 455e614 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jul 19, 2020
⌛ Testing commit 455e614 with merge 35d2deb0ad2464a5bf3b38836619c783b908448d... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jul 19, 2020
seems spurious, let's just try this again... @bors retry rollup=always |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
📌 Commit 455e614 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jul 19, 2020
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2020
…arth Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#73618 (Documentation for the false keyword) - rust-lang#74486 (Improve Read::read_exact documentation) - rust-lang#74514 (Do not clobber RUSTDOCFLAGS) - rust-lang#74516 (do not try fetching the ancestors of errored trait impls) - rust-lang#74520 (include backtrace folder in rust-src component) - rust-lang#74523 (Improve documentation for `core::fmt` internals) - rust-lang#74527 (Add myself to toolstate change notifications for rustfmt) - rust-lang#74534 (Only skip impls of foreign unstable traits) - rust-lang#74536 (fix documentation surrounding the `in` and `for` keywords) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
F-specialization
`#![feature(specialization)]`
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #74483
While building the specialization graph, we use
tcx.all_impls
which discards impls with incorrect self types,we do however call
trait_def.ancestors
with these impls which caused an ICE as they aren't part of thespecialization graph.