Skip to content

Conversation

@tyilo
Copy link
Contributor

@tyilo tyilo commented Jan 20, 2026

No description provided.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 20, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 20, 2026

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@tyilo
Copy link
Contributor Author

tyilo commented Jan 20, 2026

Seems like the id's of the following section links are also missing a .0 patch version, but I don't know if that should be changed:

$ rg 'a id="1\\.\\d{2}[^.]' RELEASES.md
...
419:<a id="1.90-Language"></a>
432:<a id="1.90-Compiler"></a>
447:<a id="1.90-Platform-Support"></a>
459:<a id="1.90-Libraries"></a>
471:<a id="1.90-Stabilized-APIs"></a>
510:<a id="1.90-Cargo"></a>
518:<a id="1.90-Rustdoc"></a>
526:<a id="1.90-Compatibility-Notes"></a>
1333:<a id="1.84-Rustdoc"></a>
1533:<a id="1.83-Rustdoc"></a>
1888:<a id="1.80-Language"></a>
1898:<a id="1.80-Compiler"></a>
1914:<a id="1.80-Libraries"></a>
1928:<a id="1.80-Stabilized-APIs"></a>
1996:<a id="1.80-Cargo"></a>
2007:<a id="1.80-Rustdoc"></a>
2016:<a id="1.80-Compatibility-Notes"></a>
2033:<a id="1.80-Internal-Changes"></a>

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Jan 20, 2026

The older ones can probably be updated too, but lets consider that separately and just worry about the current release now. Thanks for this!

@bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Jan 20, 2026

📌 Commit 6b8432b has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 20, 2026
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2026
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #151216 ([rustdoc] Make popover menus content scrollable on mobile devices)
 - #151373 (Fix an ICE on transmute goals with placeholders in `param_env`)
 - #151399 (Generate error delegation when delegation is not resolved)
 - #151406 (Use version 1.93.0 in `RELEASES.md` instead of 1.93)
 - #151410 (Fixes for LLVM 22 compatibility)
 - #151415 (chore: Remove redundant conversion)
 - #151418 (Avoid pulling in unicode when calling io::Error::kind)

r? @ghost
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit 727f5d0 into rust-lang:main Jan 21, 2026
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.95.0 milestone Jan 21, 2026
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2026
Rollup merge of #151406 - patch-2, r=cuviper

Use version 1.93.0 in `RELEASES.md` instead of 1.93
@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

The older ones can probably be updated too, but lets consider that separately and just worry about the current release now. Thanks for this!

Probably a minor issue though wouldn't that break existing links to them?

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Jan 22, 2026

Probably a minor issue though wouldn't that break existing links to them?

Yes, if any exist at all. I'm fine with leaving the older releases alone.

@tyilo
Copy link
Contributor Author

tyilo commented Jan 22, 2026

Would it make sense to add some CI job that checks that the minor version is always included? It seems like this has happened multiple times before.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants