Rollup of 5 pull requests #130979
Merged
Rollup of 5 pull requests #130979
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
- UnsafeCell: mention the term "data race", and reference the data race definition - atomic: failing RMWs are just reads, reorder and reword docs
…in line with the test directory r? jieyouxu
…=Mark-Simulacrum atomics: allow atomic and non-atomic reads to race We currently define our atomics in terms of C++ `atomic_ref`. That has the unfortunate side-effect of making it UB for an atomic and a non-atomic read to race (concretely, [this code](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=d1a743774e60923db33def7fe314d754) has UB). There's really no good reason for this, all the academic models of the C++ memory model I am aware of allow this -- C++ just disallows this because of their insistence on an "object model" with typed memory, where `atomic_ref` temporarily creates an "atomic object" that may not be accesses via regular non-atomic operations. So instead of tying our operations to `atomic_ref`, let us tie them directly to the underlying C++ memory model. I am not sure what is the best way to phrase this, so here's a first attempt. We also carve out an exception from the "no mixed-size atomic accesses" rule to permit mixed-size atomic reads -- given that we permit mixed-size non-atomic reads, it seems odd that this would be disallowed for atomic reads. However, when an atomic write races with any other atomic operation, they must use the same size. With this change, it is finally the case that every non-atomic access can be replaced by an atomic access without introducing UB. Cc `@rust-lang/opsem` `@chorman0773` `@m-ou-se` `@WaffleLapkin` `@Amanieu` Fixes rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#483
…andling, r=Kobzol simplify LLVM submodule handling Fixes rust-lang#130906.
Only add an automatic SONAME for Rust dylibs rust-lang#126094 added an automatic relative `SONAME` to all dynamic libraries, but it was really only needed for Rust `--crate-type="dylib"`. In Fedora, it was a surprise to see `SONAME` on `"cdylib"` libraries like Python modules, especially because that generates an undesirable RPM `Provides`. We can instead add a `SONAME` just for Rust dylibs by passing the crate-type argument farther. Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314879
compiletest: rename "runtest/crash.rs" to "runtest/crashes.rs" to be in line with the test directory r? jieyouxu
remove couple redundant clones
rustbot
added
A-run-make
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 612796c420 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (e6eb451): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 1.2%, secondary 0.7%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary 2.5%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 767.487s -> 768.814s (0.17%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup