update jemalloc-sys to most recent release

[lqd]

I wouldn't expect this to show perf improvements: IIUC this release should only contain a bugfix.

cc @nnethercote

r? @ghost

[lqd]

Let's see

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit dcfa64b with merge 4011361...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 4011361 (4011361b9a988b08a03271fa5d7d8537219af4d6)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4011361): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.4%	[-3.4%, -3.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.6%	[-2.8%, -2.4%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.4%	[-3.4%, -3.4%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 627.987s -> 628.231s (0.04%)
Artifact size: 273.32 MiB -> 273.32 MiB (-0.00%)

[rustbot]

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[lqd]

r? @nnethercote

feel free to close if you want

[nnethercote]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit dcfa64b has been approved by nnethercote

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit dcfa64b with merge 8e47113...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nnethercote
Pushing 8e47113 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (8e47113): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-2.3%, -1.3%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.6%	[-3.6%, -0.9%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-2.3%, -1.3%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 628.136s -> 629.434s (0.21%)
Artifact size: 273.35 MiB -> 273.36 MiB (0.00%)