Ensure query backtraces work for DefIds created after ast lowering

[oli-obk]

r? @cjgillot

[rustbot]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cjgillot (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

[oli-obk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit ab75d77 with merge b4457da2bee712a2d9abc8283884969dc8c98a6f...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: b4457da2bee712a2d9abc8283884969dc8c98a6f (b4457da2bee712a2d9abc8283884969dc8c98a6f)

[cjgillot]

r=me if perf is clean

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (b4457da2bee712a2d9abc8283884969dc8c98a6f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-1.1%, -0.2%]	9
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.1%	[4.0%, 4.1%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.9%	[-4.9%, -4.9%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.3%	[0.9%, 1.7%]	14
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[1.5%, 4.3%]	16
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.3%	[0.9%, 1.7%]	14

[oli-obk]

@bors r=cjgillot

[bors]

📌 Commit ab75d77 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ab75d77 with merge 703d95e...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing 703d95e to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (703d95e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	5

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.7%	[1.6%, 1.9%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-5.2%	[-5.2%, -5.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-5.2%	[-5.2%, -5.2%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.1%	[0.8%, 1.6%]	7
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.8%	[1.6%, 3.9%]	15
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.5%	[-3.7%, -3.4%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.1%	[0.8%, 1.6%]	7