rustdoc: remove unused CSS .content .methods > div
#101538
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This selector has its roots in these commits:
* current version:
`.content .methods > div:not(.notable-traits):not(.method)` from
9077d54
* intermediate version:
`.content .methods > div:not(.important-traits)` from
d86621f
* original version:
`.content .methods > div { margin-left: 40px; }` from
0a46933
Based on the call stack, where [`class='methods'`] calls `trait_item` and
[`trait_item`] calls [`document`], this div selector was probably intended to
target docblock and stability tags.
In the current version of the code, neither of these can possibly be nested
directly below the `class='methods'` wrapper, because the [current version of
the `trait_item` function] always wraps them in a `<details>` tag if they
exist. The only div tag that can possibly be nested directly below it now is
the one with class `method`, which is explicitly excluded.
[`class='methods'`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/0a46933c4d81573e78ce16cd215ba155a3114fce/src/librustdoc/html/render.rs#L1811-L1842
[`trait_item`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/0a46933c4d81573e78ce16cd215ba155a3114fce/src/librustdoc/html/render.rs#L1807
[`document`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/0a46933c4d81573e78ce16cd215ba155a3114fce/src/librustdoc/html/render.rs#L1515-L1523
[current version of the `trait_item` function]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e7c7aa7288559f8e5ea7ce3543ff946b09783628/src/librustdoc/html/render/print_item.rs#L710
rustbot
added
the
T-rustdoc
|
Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS. cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha |
|
r? @CraftSpider (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2022
|
Nice catch! r=me once CI pass |
|
@bors r=GuillaumeGomez rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#101343 (Add -api-level to pm command) - rust-lang#101416 (stdio: Document no support for writing to non-blocking stdio/stderr) - rust-lang#101435 (Remove unnecessary `EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_BITWIDTH`) - rust-lang#101493 (Pass ImplTraitContext as &mut to avoid the need of ImplTraitContext::reborrow) - rust-lang#101502 (Do not suggest a semicolon for a macro without `!`) - rust-lang#101503 (Add debug calls) - rust-lang#101506 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > .since`) - rust-lang#101507 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > table td`) - rust-lang#101521 (Rustdoc-Json: More accurate struct type.) - rust-lang#101525 (Fix typo in pass_manager.rs) - rust-lang#101534 (rustdoc: remove unused mobile CSS `.rustdoc { flex-direction }`) - rust-lang#101535 (Fix error printing mistake in tidy) - rust-lang#101536 (Add documentation for Attr::is_doc_comment) - rust-lang#101538 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.content .methods > div`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This selector has its roots in these commits:
current version:
.content .methods > div:not(.notable-traits):not(.method)from 9077d54intermediate version:
.content .methods > div:not(.important-traits)from d86621foriginal version:
.content .methods > div { margin-left: 40px; }from 0a46933Based on the call stack, where
class='methods'callstrait_itemandtrait_itemcallsdocument, this div selector was probably intended to target docblock and stability tags.In the current version of the code, neither of these can possibly be nested directly below the
class='methods'wrapper, because the current version of thetrait_itemfunction always wraps them in a<details>tag if they exist. The only div tag that can possibly be nested directly below it now is the one with classmethod, which is explicitly excluded.