Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Second attempt at fixing msys terminal width. #6122

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2018

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Oct 3, 2018

Lock the max width on msys-based terminals to 60. I tried a lot of different
things, but I was unable to find a way to detect the correct width in mintty.
Unfortunately this means that terminals that work correctly like ConEmu will
also be capped at 60. C'est la vie.

Of course this does not affect cmd, powershell, etc.

Fixes #6108

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

Lock the max width on msys-based terminals to 60. I tried a lot of different
things, but I was unable to find a way to detect the correct width in mintty.
Unfortunately this means that terminals that work correctly like ConEmu will
also be capped at 60. C'est la vie.

Of course this does not affect cmd, powershell, etc.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 3, 2018

📌 Commit 0503e34 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 3, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 0503e34 with merge cca192a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2018
Second attempt at fixing msys terminal width.

Lock the max width on msys-based terminals to 60. I tried a lot of different
things, but I was unable to find a way to detect the correct width in mintty.
Unfortunately this means that terminals that work correctly like ConEmu will
also be capped at 60. C'est la vie.

Of course this does not affect cmd, powershell, etc.

Fixes #6108
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 3, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing cca192a to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New cargo output is broken in MSYS2
4 participants