Skip to content

Conversation

@mechwiz
Copy link
Contributor

@mechwiz mechwiz commented Jun 21, 2022

This PR handles tolerance-checking logic for when non-active goals are running. This is specifically relevant if a trajectory is published to the joint_trajectory topic (instead of using the action server) as they are considered to be non-active goals.

@mechwiz mechwiz changed the title Hold position if tolerance is violated even during non-active goal [JTC] Hold position if tolerance is violated even during non-active goal Jun 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@destogl destogl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution! This looks like a simple solution to this. Would it be possible to write a small test for this behavior? We would then feel better in the future to know that behavior is not broken (again).

@bmagyar bmagyar merged commit 7d8a269 into ros-controls:master Aug 7, 2022
mamueluth pushed a commit to b-robotized-forks/ros2_controllers that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
…oal (ros-controls#368)

* hold position if tolerance is violated even during non-active goal

* rename abort

Co-authored-by: Michael Wiznitzer <[email protected]>
mechwiz added a commit to mechwiz/ros2_controllers that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2022
…oal (ros-controls#368)

* hold position if tolerance is violated even during non-active goal

* rename abort

Co-authored-by: Michael Wiznitzer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants