Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions .gitleaks.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ regexes = [
]

paths = [
'''benchmarks/results/.*\.json''',
]
138 changes: 138 additions & 0 deletions benchmarks/results/v3.0.1.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
{
"_calibration_notes": "Single-run capture at git_commit 0e91fd1d (tag v3.0.1). No 3-run variance band (matches v2.2.2 single-run methodology). Tolerance bands per spec: defaults apply (F1 plus or minus 7%, EM plus or minus 10%, latency plus or minus 25%, fallback plus or minus 10%, absolute floor plus or minus 0.02). Headline_cut extended with two non-canonical MAB sub_keys (factconsolidation_sh_262k, factconsolidation_mh_262k) corresponding to mab_adapter.py --source factconsolidation_{sh,mh}_262k variants; the v2.0.0 canonical four MAB splits (Conflict_Resolution, Test_Time_Learning, Long_Range_Understanding, Accurate_Retrieval) and four StructMemEval sub-tasks (location, accounting, recommendations, tree) were NOT re-measured at v3.0.1 and are TBD. StructMemEval below is the single 14-row aggregate, not the v2.0.0 per-sub-task cut. The MAB SH/MH numbers below are below the paper baselines published in mab_adapter.py BASELINES dict; see follow-up regression issue for the architectural diagnosis (BM25 retrieval does not preserve upstream serial-number prefixes that the FACTCONSOLIDATION_PROMPT rubric requires for newest-fact selection). HRR structural lane forced ON via AELFRICE_HRR_STRUCTURAL=1 to match v2.2.2 methodology. v3.0.1 ships with that default ON post-#154 composition tracker (resolver: is_hrr_structural_enabled returns True at src/aelfrice/retrieval.py:825 when no env / kwarg / TOML override; #437 gate cleared at 11/11), so this capture and the default-config measurement now agree. Bench fixtures (StructMemEval, MAB HF dataset, LongMemEval, LoCoMo) downloaded fresh per run; not pinned by checksum.",
"aelfrice_version": "3.0.1",
"captured_at_utc": "2026-05-13T00:00:00Z",
"git_commit": "0e91fd1df18c41cc3667e87c89005c7b5cc670d5",
"harness_version": "1",
"headline_cut": {
"locomo": [
{
"args": [],
"sub_key": null
}
],
"longmemeval": [
{
"args": [],
"sub_key": null
}
],
"mab": [
{
"args": ["--split", "Conflict_Resolution", "--source", "factconsolidation_sh_262k"],
"sub_key": "factconsolidation_sh_262k"
},
{
"args": ["--split", "Conflict_Resolution", "--source", "factconsolidation_mh_262k"],
"sub_key": "factconsolidation_mh_262k"
}
],
"structmemeval": [
{
"args": [],
"sub_key": null
}
]
},
"label": "v3.0.1 parity",
"metric_overrides": {},
"results": {
"locomo": {
"_": {
"_elapsed_sec": null,
"_status": "ok",
"output": {
"overall_f1": 0.4088,
"total_qa": 1986,
"category_f1": {
"1": 0.3849,
"2": 0.3062,
"3": 0.2475,
"4": 0.4878,
"5": 0.3834
},
"n_runs": 1,
"variance_probed": false
}
}
},
"longmemeval": {
"_": {
"_elapsed_sec": null,
"_status": "ok",
"output": {
"metric": "accuracy",
"score_pct": 74.0,
"correct": 370,
"total": 500,
"per_category": {
"knowledge-update": {"correct": 63, "total": 78, "accuracy_pct": 80.8},
"multi-session": {"correct": 75, "total": 133, "accuracy_pct": 56.4},
"single-session-assistant": {"correct": 48, "total": 56, "accuracy_pct": 85.7},
"single-session-preference": {"correct": 25, "total": 30, "accuracy_pct": 83.3},
"single-session-user": {"correct": 61, "total": 70, "accuracy_pct": 87.1},
"temporal-reasoning": {"correct": 98, "total": 133, "accuracy_pct": 73.7}
},
"strict_rejudge": {
"metric": "accuracy",
"score_pct": 76.8,
"correct": 384,
"total": 500,
"per_category": {
"knowledge-update": {"correct": 66, "total": 78, "accuracy_pct": 84.6},
"multi-session": {"correct": 81, "total": 133, "accuracy_pct": 60.9},
"single-session-assistant": {"correct": 47, "total": 56, "accuracy_pct": 83.9},
"single-session-preference": {"correct": 28, "total": 30, "accuracy_pct": 93.3},
"single-session-user": {"correct": 67, "total": 70, "accuracy_pct": 95.7},
"temporal-reasoning": {"correct": 95, "total": 133, "accuracy_pct": 71.4}
}
},
"n_runs": 1,
"variance_probed": false
}
}
},
"mab": {
"factconsolidation_sh_262k": {
"_elapsed_sec": null,
"_status": "ok",
"output": {
"metric": "substring_exact_match",
"score_pct": 57.0,
"correct": 57,
"total": 100,
"n_runs": 1,
"variance_probed": false
}
},
"factconsolidation_mh_262k": {
"_elapsed_sec": null,
"_status": "ok",
"output": {
"metric": "substring_exact_match",
"score_pct": 6.0,
"correct": 6,
"total": 100,
"n_runs": 1,
"variance_probed": false
}
}
},
"structmemeval": {
"_": {
"_elapsed_sec": null,
"_status": "ok",
"output": {
"metric": "accuracy",
"score_pct": 100.0,
"correct": 14,
"total": 14,
"n_runs": 1,
"variance_probed_3run_distribution": [0, 7, 100, 100],
"variance_probed_note": "3-run variance probe gave [0%, 7%, 100%, 100%] across 4 attempts; the 14/14 headline is not robust. Treat as inadmissible without multi-run protocol. See follow-up issue for non-robustness diagnosis."
}
}
}
},
"schema_version": "1.0"
}
Loading