Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up Arrow extension hell, implement RERUN:component_name #3360

Closed
teh-cmc opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6439
Closed

Clean up Arrow extension hell, implement RERUN:component_name #3360

teh-cmc opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6439
Assignees
Labels
🏹 arrow concerning arrow ⛃ re_datastore affects the datastore itself

Comments

@teh-cmc
Copy link
Member

teh-cmc commented Sep 19, 2023

I'll write something down at some point, but for the moment, refer to this thread.

@teh-cmc teh-cmc added 🏹 arrow concerning arrow ⛃ re_datastore affects the datastore itself labels Sep 19, 2023
@teh-cmc teh-cmc self-assigned this May 16, 2024
teh-cmc added a commit that referenced this issue May 31, 2024
A `TransportChunk` is a `Chunk` that is ready for transport and/or
storage.
It is very cheap to go from `Chunk` to a `TransportChunk` and
vice-versa.

A `TransportChunk` maps 1:1 to a native Arrow `RecordBatch`. It has a
stable ABI, and can be cheaply send across process boundaries.
`arrow2` has no `RecordBatch` type; we will get one once we migrate to
`arrow-rs`.

A `TransportChunk` is self-describing: it contains all the data _and_
metadata needed to index it into storage.

We rely heavily on chunk-level and field-level metadata to communicate
Rerun-specific semantics over the wire, e.g. whether some columns are
already properly sorted.

The Arrow metadata system is fairly limited -- it's all untyped strings
--, but for now that seems good enough. It will be trivial to switch to
something else later, if need be.

- Fixes #1760
- Fixes #1692
- Fixes #3360 
- Fixes #1696

---

Part of a PR series to implement our new chunk-based data model on the
client-side (SDKs):
- #6437
- #6438
- #6439
- #6440
- #6441
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏹 arrow concerning arrow ⛃ re_datastore affects the datastore itself
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant