Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wip: initial fetchStrategy #11001

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

wip: initial fetchStrategy #11001

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jacob-ebey
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 7, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 70724fe

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@jacob-ebey jacob-ebey marked this pull request as draft November 7, 2023 22:20
@@ -339,6 +339,23 @@ export type HydrationState = Partial<
Pick<RouterState, "loaderData" | "actionData" | "errors">
>;

export interface DefaultCallLoaderOrActionFunction {
(
type: "loader" | "action",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to call actions? I've been envisioning this as a loader-only concept

import { json } from "../index";
import { cleanup, setup } from "./utils/data-router-setup";
import { createFormData } from "./utils/utils";

let fetchStrategy: FetchStrategy;
beforeEach(() => {
fetchStrategy = jest.fn(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to provide the default and update all the existing tests? Since fetchStrategy will be a net-new optional prop, I think we should be able to leave all existing tests untouched and then add a few tests that set it accordingly?

describe('fetchStrategy', () => {
  it('fetches in parallel if no fetchStrategy is provided', ...);
  it('allows users to re-implement the default parallel fetching via Promise.all/defaultCallLoader', ...);
  it('allows users to implement a custom fetch strategy (single-fetch)', ...);
  it('allows users to implement a custom fetch strategy (composing gql fragments from handle)', ...);
});

@brophdawg11
Copy link
Contributor

Superseded by #11098

@brophdawg11 brophdawg11 deleted the single-fetch branch July 12, 2024 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants