Skip to content

Conversation

@paulohtb6
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Resolves https://redpandadata.atlassian.net/browse/
Review deadline:

Page previews

Checks

  • New feature
  • Content gap
  • Support Follow-up
  • Small fix (typos, links, copyedits, etc)

@paulohtb6 paulohtb6 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2025 14:28
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Deploy Preview for redpanda-docs-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 544e00a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/redpanda-docs-preview/deploys/68cac58aabdcff0008831044
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1359--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Removed two formatting lines—a horizontal rule (----) and an extra blank/stray line—between the end of the sasl_mechanisms section and the schema_registry_always_normalize heading in modules/reference/pages/properties/cluster-properties.adoc. No content, semantics, defaults, or behavior were changed. Only section separation/formatting was adjusted.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Feediver1
  • nvartolomei
  • kbatuigas

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The PR description currently contains the repository template with placeholders left unchanged (the placeholder, no review deadline, no page preview links, and the Checks checklist unchecked), so it does not provide the specific required details reviewers need even though the file-level change is minor formatting. Please update the description by replacing the placeholder with the actual Jira issue link (or remove the resolves line if not applicable), add a review deadline if required, include one or more Netlify page preview URLs for the edited file, check the appropriate box under "Checks" (e.g., "Small fix"), and add a brief one-line summary of the actual change (for example, "removed stray formatting lines in cluster-properties.adoc") so reviewers can quickly see the intent.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Update cluster-properties.adoc" directly matches the file changed in this changeset and therefore accurately reflects the scope of the edit (a small formatting cleanup in cluster-properties.adoc), but it is minimal and does not describe the specific intent.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch paulohtb6-patch-1

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b01d63f and 544e00a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/reference/pages/properties/cluster-properties.adoc (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • modules/reference/pages/properties/cluster-properties.adoc
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - redpanda-docs-preview
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - redpanda-docs-preview
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - redpanda-docs-preview

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@micheleRP micheleRP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@paulohtb6 paulohtb6 merged commit 7b7f77e into main Sep 17, 2025
7 checks passed
@paulohtb6 paulohtb6 deleted the paulohtb6-patch-1 branch September 17, 2025 22:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants