Skip to content

restore cudf dependency#1544

Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.10from
jameslamb:put-cudf-back
Aug 29, 2025
Merged

restore cudf dependency#1544
rapids-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intorapidsai:branch-25.10from
jameslamb:put-cudf-back

Conversation

@jameslamb
Copy link
Member

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#208

#1536 temporarily removed the cudf test-time dependency here, because there weren't yet CUDA 13 cudf packages.

Those now exist (rapidsai/cudf#19768), so this restores that dependency.

@jameslamb jameslamb added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Aug 29, 2025
@copy-pr-bot
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Member Author

/ok to test

@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title WIP: restore cudf dependency restore cudf dependency Aug 29, 2025
@jameslamb jameslamb marked this pull request as ready for review August 29, 2025 02:48
@jameslamb jameslamb requested review from a team as code owners August 29, 2025 02:48
Copy link
Contributor

@vyasr vyasr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving assuming Peter gives his blessing, I know there's been some additional discussion on the suitable way for handling the cudf and dask[dataframe] dependencies between here and rapids-dask-dependency.

Copy link
Member

@pentschev pentschev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks everyone!

@jameslamb
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit bca02c4 into rapidsai:branch-25.10 Aug 29, 2025
40 checks passed
@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the put-cudf-back branch August 29, 2025 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants