Update UCX-Py version to 0.21 - #1650
Conversation
|
Waiting for #1649 to be merged first. |
| sed_runner "s/dask-cuda=${CURRENT_SHORT_TAG}/dask-cuda=${NEXT_SHORT_TAG}/g" ${FILE}; | ||
| sed_runner "s/dask-cudf=${CURRENT_SHORT_TAG}/dask-cudf=${NEXT_SHORT_TAG}/g" ${FILE}; | ||
| sed_runner "s/ucx-py=${CURRENT_SHORT_TAG}/ucx-py=${NEXT_SHORT_TAG}/g" ${FILE}; | ||
| sed_runner "s/ucx-py=0.21/ucx-py=0.21/g" ${FILE}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is a no-op, so we can remove this line.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-21.08 #1650 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage ? 59.68%
===============================================
Files ? 80
Lines ? 3542
Branches ? 0
===============================================
Hits ? 2114
Misses ? 1428
Partials ? 0 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@gpucibot merge |
|
Seems like there are several potentially legit cuGraph failures here, @rlratzel @BradReesWork could you take a look? |
|
Oh, actually those seem to be because we're installing Dask/Distributed 2021.5.1, but we need 2021.6.0 or main for branch-21.08. It seems that this was covered by Lines 75 to 77 in 6aab21f |
|
Actually no, rapidsai/dask-cuda#645 won't help because it targets branch-21.06. I think something in the following block is downgrading Dask/Distributed: Lines 89 to 113 in 6aab21f I'm not sure what package is the cause for downgrade, but perhaps we could move the Dask install after cuGraph? Also, this will need to wait for rapidsai/dask-cuda#647, as rapidsai/dask-cuda#645 just got merged and that pins 2021.5.1 in Dask-CUDA. |
|
rerun tests |
|
Rerunning tests now that cuDF and integration repo have been updated. |
|
looks like this might be blocked by #1637 now. that one should hopefully be merged soon. |
|
@pentschev, can you pull the latest changes here now that #1637 is merged? |
Done. |
No description provided.