-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
libwholegraph: build wheels without build isolation #388
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 5 commits into
rapidsai:main
from
jameslamb:libwholegraph-build-isolation
Jan 20, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bc603a6
libwholegraph: build wheels without build isolation
jameslamb 1b0cee7
fix needs blocks
jameslamb b213eb8
add cmake and ninja to 'requirements' outputs
jameslamb ea2064c
build cugraph-pyg on cpu4
jameslamb aaf62e4
Update ci/build_wheel.sh
jameslamb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As a note: for some reason
cpu4has tended to queue for a long time in the past. I've been sticking tocpu8at minimum. Not sure if this is still the case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh interesting, I didn't realize that. I was just thinking "small = cheap" and hadn't considered the queue.
I just checked and it looks like we allow up to 1000 cpu4 instances at a time (per CPU architecture... 1000 amd64 and 1000 arm64) and haven't come close to hitting that in the last 7 days. The 7-day max looks like around 800 busy runners, and the typical load is usually closer to like 350 busy at a time.
(can share dashboard links privately if you're curious)
So I think this change should be ok and hopefully shouldn't introduce new queuing problems.