Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve new_project script #4373
Improve new_project script #4373
Changes from all commits
f89cada
ac491e1
937a304
f229c71
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While updating #4222, it occurred to me that this can be written without
test
, since you just want to check the exit code (which is whatif
does by default):This is simpler than the existing code and doesn't have the potentially misleading†
"$IS_GIT_REPO" -eq 0
check, but it's not necessarily better since it requires a comment to be as clear as the original.†To clarify, my problem with
"$IS_GIT_REPO" -eq 0
is that to someone who's not used to reading shell scripts, it might look like it's checking that this is not a Git repo, due to the variable name. I think something likeGIT_REPO_STATUS
would be more appropriate.