Merge maintenance 2.15.x in main#7426
Merge maintenance 2.15.x in main#7426Pierre-Sassoulas wants to merge 14 commits intopylint-dev:mainfrom
Conversation
Co-authored-by: orSolocate <38433858+orSolocate@users.noreply.github.com>
…l is assigned to a class attribute inside the class where the function is defined. (pylint-dev#7395) Closes pylint-dev#6592
Previously pylint would lint a file passed on stdin even if the user meant to ignore the file. This commit fixes that issue. Co-authored-by: Daniël van Noord <13665637+DanielNoord@users.noreply.github.com>
… annotations (pylint-dev#7400) Don't emit 'unused-variable' or 'unused-import' on names in string literal type annotations (pylint-dev#3299) Don't treat strings inside typing.Literal as names
* Fix and refactors for ``docparams`` extension The ``re_only_desc`` regex did not match for white and characters after ``\n``, so some description-only lines weren't getting matched. In addition, lookaheads were added to ``re_param_line`` (i.e. make sure the type group is not followed by a new line (``\n``)). Lastly, named groups (ala Perl regular expressions) were added for slightly improved clarity. Co-authored-by: Hendry, Adam <adam.grant.hendry@gmail.com>
This also upgrade to astroid 2.12.8.
What do you mean? Are some fragments still there? Isn't that what we want for the |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3003583687
💛 - Coveralls |
Duh, you're right I forgot that. |
Interesting. I don't think we should repeat a bug fragment from X.Y.Z on the X.Y+1 changelog or the X+1 changelog. If it was fixed in 4.10.1, it's not newsworthy in 4.11. |
|
Did not manage to find the issue with the discussion (Even if I searched quite extensively), but if I remember correctly @DudeNr33 explained that it was intended to be like this a little prior to the discussion above in another issue and I forgot about it in this MR which is why the discussion is so short here. Would you mind sharing your view on the matter in #9302 Andreas ? |
There's an issue in the fragment that are not removed after the merge that I added in #7362. Hopefully we can delete all false positives and bug fixes fragments.