Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ROB: fix extract_text() issues on damaged PDFs #2760

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

pubpub-zz
Copy link
Collaborator

@pubpub-zz pubpub-zz commented Jul 18, 2024

closes #2702

@pubpub-zz pubpub-zz changed the title Iss2702 ROB: fix extract_text() issues on damaged PDFs Jul 18, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.85%. Comparing base (cf7fcfd) to head (7de52cc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2760      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.84%   95.85%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines        8523     8522       -1     
  Branches     1692     1691       -1     
==========================================
  Hits         8169     8169              
  Misses        209      209              
+ Partials      145      144       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@stefan6419846
Copy link
Collaborator

Is there something we can do about the coverage here?

@pubpub-zz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The modification is properly test covered. The incomplete coverage is on the original condition but I do not see what is wrong. any ideas ?

@pubpub-zz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@stefan6419846 ,?
even the new rewriting does not fix the coverage. no other solution than using pragma. OK for you?

@stefan6419846
Copy link
Collaborator

I recommend to remove the pragma in this case. It seems like we somehow end up with incomplete branch coverage, but it is not clear to me why. I will be merging this without the pragma in this case.

@stefan6419846
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems like there are some more changes required after the merge of main, as there are still references to the removed b_.

@pubpub-zz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I 'm definitively not fond of the conflict managment through the web pages.
It is now fixed

@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 merged commit 2eb565d into py-pdf:main Aug 13, 2024
16 checks passed
@pubpub-zz pubpub-zz mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2024
pubpub-zz added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
## Version 5.0.0, 2024-09-15

This version drops support for Python 3.7 (not maintained since July 2023), PdfMerger (use PdfWriter instead) and AnnotationBuilder (use annotations instead).


### Deprecations (DEP)
- Remove the deprecated PfdMerger and AnnotationBuilder classes and other deprecations cleanup (#2813)
- Drop Python 3.7 support (#2793)

### New Features (ENH)
- Add capability to remove /Info from PDF (#2820)
- Add incremental capability to PdfWriter (#2811)
- Add UniGB-UTF16 encodings (#2819)
- Accept utf strings for metadata (#2802)
- Report PdfReadError instead of RecursionError (#2800)
- Compress PDF files merging identical objects (#2795)

### Bug Fixes (BUG)
- Fix sheared image (#2801)

### Robustness (ROB)
- Robustify .set_data() (#2821)
- Raise PdfReadError when missing /Root in trailer (#2808)
- Fix extract_text() issues on damaged PDFs (#2760)
- Handle images with empty data when processing an image from bytes (#2786)

### Developer Experience (DEV)
- Fix coverage uploads (#2832)
- Test against Python 3.13 (#2776)


[Full Changelog](4.3.1...5.0.0)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

local variable 'cm' referenced before assignment
2 participants