[Fix] Replaced automatable PICS in SEAR tests #35231
Open
+31
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
j-ororke
commented
Aug 27, 2024
j-ororke
commented
- Replaced automatable PICS in SEAR 1.3, 1.5, and 1.6 test modules with attributes gathered from endpoint.
- Replaced automatable PICS in SEAR 1.3, 1.5, and 1.6 test modules.
|
Review changes with Changed Files
|
github-actions
bot
added
tests
matter-1.4-te2-script-change
- resolved linting issue
|
PR #35231: Size comparison from 32c961f to 32cd0ad Full report (77 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
|
PR #35231: Size comparison from 4d4fcb3 to b830540 Full report (77 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
|
PR #35231: Size comparison from 3bf596f to b253b36 Full report (77 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
- Replaced C02.Rsp with SkipArea command id check against accepted commands list for SearchArea cluster
|
PR #35231: Size comparison from 3d69583 to b8903bc Full report (77 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andy31415,
andyg-apple,
anush-apple,
arkq,
axelnxp,
bauerschwan,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
chapongatien,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu and
chulspro
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
tecimovic,
tehampson,
tima-q,
tobiasgraf,
turon,
vivien-apple,
wiba-nordic,
woody-apple,
younghak-hwang,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
|
Does this align with the Test Plan? I think this is a good addition but it needs to be aligned with the Test Plan and given the timing, this might be something we need to postpone to 1.5? |
cecille
reviewed
Oct 22, 2024
src/python_testing/TC_SEAR_1_6.py
Outdated
| @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ async def read_progress(self, step): | |||
| return progress | |||
|
|
|||
| def TC_SEAR_1_6(self) -> list[str]: | |||
| return ["SEAR.S", "SEAR.S.A0005", "SEAR.S.A0000", "SEAR.S.A0002", "SEAR.S.M.HAS_MANUAL_OPERATING_STATE_CONTROL"] | |||
| return ["SEAR.S", "SEAR.S.M.HAS_MANUAL_OPERATING_STATE_CONTROL"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, let's just leave this test as-is for now. The top level pics we can deal with separately and this will mess up the TH
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you,
This has been updated to leave the top level PICS as-is and should now be resolved.
src/python_testing/TC_SEAR_1_5.py
Outdated
| @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ async def send_cmd_skip_area_expect_response(self, step, skipped_area, expected_ | |||
| f"Command response ({ret.status}) doesn't match the expected one") | |||
|
|
|||
| def TC_SEAR_1_5(self) -> list[str]: | |||
| return ["SEAR.S", "SEAR.S.C02.Rsp"] | |||
| return ["SEAR.S"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same here - let's leave the top level PICS as-is for now and we'll deal with the top level PICS separately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This has been updated to leave the top level PICS as-is.
cecille
removed
the
matter-1.4-te2-script-change
Updating to leave top level PIC's unchanged
github-actions
bot
added
the
matter-1.4-te2-script-change
Updating to leave top level PICS alone
j-ororke
removed
the
matter-1.4-te2-script-change
github-actions
bot
added
the
matter-1.4-te2-script-change
j-ororke
removed
the
matter-1.4-te2-script-change
|
PR #35231: Size comparison from 4c69001 to c74e2da Full report (25 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, nrfconnect, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
matter-1.4-te2-script-change
|
PR #35231: Size comparison from a3a443a to ed064c2 Full report (69 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
|
PR #35231: Size comparison from 1c92162 to 5156b82 Full report (69 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.