Skip to content

Conversation

@raymondkfcheung
Copy link
Contributor

@raymondkfcheung raymondkfcheung commented May 22, 2025

Ensures every XCM processed with the same topic ID across multiple chains to improve traceability.

Partially addresses paritytech/polkadot-sdk#6119 and relates to paritytech/polkadot-sdk#7691.

athei and others added 30 commits May 5, 2025 16:57
Re-Enable as last step
TODO:
- Resolve the `Imbalance` type mismatch on `pallet_staking`
…ves parachain runtime

TODO: Check whether we need some `AuthorizedAliasingConsideration`.
…rachains' runtimes

TODO: Check whether we need some `AuthorizedAliasingConsideration`.
…ub parachains' runtimes

TODO:
- important: `core` rewrite over `sp_io`. Can't compile `bridge-hub-polkadot-runtime`. Can't figure out which dependency has the `std` open.
- Check whether we need some `AuthorizedAliasingConsideration`.
… parachains' runtimes

TODO:
- important: `core` rewrite over `sp_io`. Can't compile both parachain runtimes. Can't figure out which dependency has the `std` open.
- Check whether we need some `AuthorizedAliasingConsideration`.
[At/2503] Pass compilation for several runtimes
@raymondkfcheung raymondkfcheung marked this pull request as draft May 22, 2025 13:52
@raymondkfcheung
Copy link
Contributor Author

Depends on #711

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	Cargo.lock
#	Cargo.toml
#	relay/kusama/src/lib.rs
#	relay/polkadot/src/lib.rs
#	system-parachains/bridge-hubs/bridge-hub-kusama/src/lib.rs
@raymondkfcheung raymondkfcheung marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2025 08:31
Copy link
Contributor

@acatangiu acatangiu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@raymondkfcheung please squash all the commits - currently the PR shows all the commits from PR711 which was already merged

Comment on lines +38 to +40
Kusama::execute_with(|| {
Dmp::make_parachain_reachable(CoretimeKusama::para_id());
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm how did these pass before?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure why. But these two tests are failed locally.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm how did these pass before?

Explained here: #759 (comment)

@raymondkfcheung
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing it, in favour of #759.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants