-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: Produce all available statistical maps from each analysis unit #131
Conversation
@tyarkoni @adelavega We should discuss what the appropriate outputs to be displayed at each level, and what are the appropriate ones to pass to the next level. Currently, we are displaying and passing But a thing to note: nistats doesn't permit using effects and variances to perform second-level models; you just get one map and you run an intercept. I believe @bthirion said he uses z-score maps for this reason, but it's not clear to me that this is equivalent. |
No, this is not equivalent. I'm actually working on adding mixed-effects models with known firs-level variance to nistats. I have a branch with it. Will send a PR tomorrow. |
af35ba8
to
86bed35
Compare
From what I can tell, this closes #133. I would just suggest renaming the input names of |
0a3dd86
to
99541ea
Compare
@adelavega This works for me on a 3-level model. Do you want to test before I merge, or just go for it? |
Looks good from a quick glance, so go ahead and merge and I'll test with the other upcoming changes. |
Fixes #124.
Closes #125.
Closes #133.