Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First-level outputs #124

Closed
effigies opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #131
Closed

First-level outputs #124

effigies opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #131

Comments

@effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

In #48, we switched from z-scores to effect sizes in the first-level outputs. These are more useful at the second level, but not great for visualizing.

In nilearn/nistats#183, we added the ability to easily get all output types ('z_score', 'stat', 'p_value', 'effect_size', 'effect_variance'), so which of these are the most useful? Do people have opinions?

cc @satra @mgxd

@tyarkoni
Copy link
Collaborator

See #125 for semi-related thoughts about naming schemes.

Is there any reason we shouldn't output everything by default? Other than disk space, what's the downside? I think most users are probably going to want to have the flexibility to peruse a comprehensive set of results (I certainly would).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants