Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: don't push down predicates over table dual #35669

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 30, 2022

Conversation

tangenta
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #35527

Problem Summary:

When a table dual is used as view or subquery, the PPD(Predicate Push-Down) optimizer incorrectly pushes the predicate down to the table dual.

After rule-based optimization:

*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalSelection(*core.LogicalTableDual)))

After the physical optimization, the columns in condition need to be relocated using the schema of child operator(it is TableDual here). As we know, the schema of TableDual is always nil. An error is occurred.

What is changed and how it works?

This PR avoids to push the predicates to the TableDual, but keeps a Projection over it instead.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jun 23, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • mjonss
  • xhebox

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 23, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jun 23, 2022

@winoros
Copy link
Member

winoros commented Jun 23, 2022

mysql> explain select c0 from (select null as c0) v0 where c0 is null;
+-------------------+---------+------+---------------+-----------------+
| id                | estRows | task | access object | operator info   |
+-------------------+---------+------+---------------+-----------------+
| Projection_6      | 1.00    | root |               | <nil>->Column#1 |
| └─TableDual_7     | 1.00    | root |               | rows:1          |
+-------------------+---------+------+---------------+-----------------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)

mysql> explain select c0 from (select null as c0) v0 where c0 is null;
ERROR 2013 (HY000): Lost connection to MySQL server during query
No connection. Trying to reconnect...
Connection id:    403
Current database: test

+---------------------+---------+------+---------------+------------------+
| id                  | estRows | task | access object | operator info    |
+---------------------+---------+------+---------------+------------------+
| Selection_6         | 0.80    | root |               | isnull(Column#1) |
| └─Projection_7      | 1.00    | root |               | <nil>->Column#1  |
|   └─TableDual_8     | 1.00    | root |               | rows:1           |
+---------------------+---------+------+---------------+------------------+
3 rows in set (0.32 sec)

This change caused the above diff.
I'm also a little curious about why the normal explain select c0 from (select null as c0) v0 where c0 is null; would not trigger this bug because the view only support expanding itself now which means it should be the same with the above SQL`.

@tangenta
Copy link
Contributor Author

tangenta commented Jun 29, 2022

I'm also a little curious about why the normal explain select c0 from (select null as c0) v0 where c0 is null; would not trigger this bug

@winoros I tried to print the logical plan in each step of logical optimization:

[optimizer.go:456] ["logicalOptimize before"] [logic=*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalSelection(*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalTableDual)))]
[optimizer.go:470] [logicalOptimize] [rule=column_prune] [logic=*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalSelection(*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalTableDual)))]
[optimizer.go:470] [logicalOptimize] [rule=projection_eliminate] [logic=*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalSelection(*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalTableDual)))]
[optimizer.go:470] [logicalOptimize] [rule=predicate_push_down] [logic=*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalTableDual))]
...
[optimizer.go:475] ["logicalOptimize after"] [logic=*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalProjection(*core.LogicalTableDual))]

You can see the LogicalSelection is eliminated by "predicate_push_down" rule. This is not happened in where (c0 is null) like (null). For the operator LIKE, the first argument must be a string. Thus, a cast function is inserted automatically:

where cast((c0 is null) as string) like (null)

The "predicate_push_down" rule tries to eliminate the selection by PropagateConstant and then DeleteTrueExprs. However, because the collation of NULL("binary") is stricter than "utf8mb4_bin", which is the collation of cast((c0 is null) as string), the column substitution failed. That's why the selection is not eliminated.

Anyway, even if the selection operator is not pushed down, it shouldn't report the error "Can't find column Column#1 in schema Column: [] Unique key: []".

Copy link
Contributor

@mjonss mjonss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jun 30, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jun 30, 2022
@xhebox
Copy link
Contributor

xhebox commented Jun 30, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 0325dbb

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jun 30, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 86cd94a into pingcap:master Jun 30, 2022
@winoros
Copy link
Member

winoros commented Jun 30, 2022

I used the wrong SQL for checking. Now i have no question(

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jun 30, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [1] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🔴 failed 1, success 10, total 11 19 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 35 tests passed 26 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 12 tests passed 10 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 6 min 13 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 6 min 1 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 5 min 57 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 5 min 44 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 3 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 52 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

you06 added a commit to you06/tidb that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2022
Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

fix tests

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

fix test

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

update

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

update bazel

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

fix test

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

fix test

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

update

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

update client-go

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

update client-go

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

update grafana

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

update bazel

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

display by stack

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

set request source for ctx of

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

address comment

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

address comment

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

parser, ddl: support decoding binary literal in set/enum (pingcap#35822)

close pingcap#31338

executor: fix a nil point when @@tidb_enable_collect_execution_info is off and cop cache is on (pingcap#35839)

close pingcap#35829

ddl: support drop columns for multi-schema change (pingcap#35737)

ref pingcap#14766

planner: don't push down predicates over table dual (pingcap#35669)

close pingcap#35527

*: Remove some useless staleness code (pingcap#35849)

close pingcap#35848

ddl: fix potential wrong column definition when setting default value (pingcap#35845)

close pingcap#35846

*: add timeout for test cases (pingcap#35844)

ddl: remove `onDropColumns` and `onAddColumns` (pingcap#35862)

ref pingcap#14766

*: Fix Dockerfile (pingcap#35835)

close pingcap#35828

server: refactor TestConnExecutionTimeout (pingcap#35865)

close pingcap#35868

fix test

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>

fix lint

Signed-off-by: you06 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

unexpected unresolved column error when the view refers to dual table
6 participants