Skip to content

[pallet-revive] Add vesting precompile#11398

Merged
0xRVE merged 46 commits intomasterfrom
rve/vesting-precompile3
Apr 2, 2026
Merged

[pallet-revive] Add vesting precompile#11398
0xRVE merged 46 commits intomasterfrom
rve/vesting-precompile3

Conversation

@0xRVE
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@0xRVE 0xRVE commented Mar 17, 2026

Summary

Adds a new built-in precompile (pallet-revive-precompile-vesting) that exposes Substrate's pallet-vesting to EVM contracts via pallet-revive. EVM contracts can call vest(), vestOther(address), vestingBalance(), and vestingBalanceOf(address) at the precompile address 0x0902.

Changes

  • substrate/frame/revive/uapi/sol/IVesting.sol: New Solidity interface defining the vesting precompile ABI
  • substrate/frame/revive/uapi/src/precompiles/vesting.rs: Binds the Solidity interface via alloy_core::sol!
  • substrate/frame/revive/precompiles/: New crate implementing the Precompile trait — dispatches vest/vestOther through pallet_vesting and queries locked balances via VestingSchedule
  • substrate/frame/revive/src/tests.rs: Trailing comma fix in construct_runtime!

Test plan

  • New vesting precompile tests pass (vest, vestOther, vestingBalance, vestingBalanceOf)
  • Existing pallet-revive tests unaffected

@0xRVE 0xRVE added I5-enhancement An additional feature request. T7-smart_contracts This PR/Issue is related to smart contracts. A5-run-CI Run CI on draft PR labels Mar 17, 2026
@0xRVE 0xRVE force-pushed the rve/vesting-precompile3 branch from 6f1a818 to 2180edb Compare March 17, 2026 16:04
@0xRVE
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

0xRVE commented Mar 17, 2026

/cmd prdoc --audience runtime_dev --bump minor

@0xRVE 0xRVE marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2026 08:23
Comment thread substrate/frame/vesting/precompiles/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread substrate/frame/vesting/precompiles/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread substrate/frame/vesting/precompiles/src/benchmarking.rs Outdated
Comment thread substrate/frame/vesting/precompiles/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread substrate/frame/vesting/precompiles/src/tests.rs
Comment thread substrate/frame/vesting/precompiles/src/weights.rs Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@marian-radu marian-radu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGMT!

@0xRVE
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

0xRVE commented Apr 2, 2026

/cmd bench --runtime dev --pallet pallet_vesting_precompiles

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Command "bench --runtime dev --pallet pallet_vesting_precompiles" has started 🚀 See logs here

@seadanda
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

seadanda commented Apr 2, 2026

Out of interest: any reason why we're not supporting vested transfers in the precompile?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Command "bench --runtime dev --pallet pallet_vesting_precompiles" has failed ❌! See logs here

@0xRVE
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

0xRVE commented Apr 2, 2026

Out of interest: any reason why we're not supporting vested transfers in the precompile?

initially i tried to limit the scope. I just added the vested_transfer call

EDIT
Will make a follow up PR to extend the precompile because this PR was already reviewed and approved

@0xRVE 0xRVE force-pushed the rve/vesting-precompile3 branch from 7e47d07 to d3d78c0 Compare April 2, 2026 10:04
@0xRVE
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

0xRVE commented Apr 2, 2026

/cmd bench --runtime dev --pallet pallet_vesting_precompiles

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Command "bench --runtime dev --pallet pallet_vesting_precompiles" has started 🚀 See logs here

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Command "bench --runtime dev --pallet pallet_vesting_precompiles" has finished ✅ See logs here

Details

Subweight results:
File Extrinsic Old New Change [%]
substrate/frame/vesting/precompiles/src/weights.rs vesting_balance_of 97.94us Added
substrate/frame/vesting/precompiles/src/weights.rs vesting_balance 41.49us Added
Command output:

✅ Successful benchmarks of runtimes/pallets:
-- dev: ['pallet_vesting_precompiles']

@0xRVE 0xRVE added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 2, 2026
Merged via the queue into master with commit 802db0b Apr 2, 2026
349 of 368 checks passed
@0xRVE 0xRVE deleted the rve/vesting-precompile3 branch April 2, 2026 14:36
@seadanda
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

seadanda commented Apr 2, 2026

Please don't force push to a PR which has already been posted, especially not when it has been reviewed

lexnv added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2026
Squashed commit of the following:

commit e9ab097
Author: eskimor <robert@gonimo.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 3 00:53:19 2026 +0200

    Pr doc

commit ef9dfac
Author: eskimor <robert@gonimo.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 3 00:41:08 2026 +0200

    Fix warning

commit 076e7e9
Author: eskimor <robert@gonimo.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 3 00:09:28 2026 +0200

    Tests

commit cdfc57c
Author: eskimor <robert@gonimo.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 3 00:09:03 2026 +0200

    Fix test

commit a1a2bbf
Author: clangenb <37865735+clangenb@users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 2 22:55:34 2026 +0200

    Fix slot-based collator panic during warp sync (#11072) (#11381)

    When a parachain collator starts with `--authoring=slot-based` and
    performs warp sync, the `slot-based-block-builder` essential task
    immediately calls `slot_duration()` which requires
    `AuraApi_slot_duration`. During warp sync the runtime isn't ready, so
    this fails and the task returns, shutting down the node.

    The lookahead collator avoids this by calling `wait_for_aura()` before
    starting. This PR adds an equivalent guard to the slot-based collator.

    ### Manual test
    Before the fix the collator panicked after the relay chain warp sync
    with AuraApi_slot_duration not available, which does not occur anymore
    now.
    ```
     ./target/release/polkadot-parachain \
        --chain asset-hub-polkadot \
        --sync warp \
        --authoring=slot-based \
        --tmp -- --sync warp
    ```
    Closes #11072.

    ---------

    Co-authored-by: cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: clangenb <clangenb@users.noreply.github.com>

commit 802db0b
Author: 0xRVE <robertvaneerdewijk@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 2 16:39:00 2026 +0300

    [pallet-revive] Add vesting precompile (#11398)

    ## Summary

    Adds a new built-in precompile (`pallet-revive-precompile-vesting`) that
    exposes Substrate's `pallet-vesting` to EVM contracts via pallet-revive.
    EVM contracts can call `vest()`, `vestOther(address)`,
    `vestingBalance()`, and `vestingBalanceOf(address)` at the precompile
    address `0x0902`.

    ## Changes

    - **`substrate/frame/revive/uapi/sol/IVesting.sol`**: New Solidity
    interface defining the vesting precompile ABI
    - **`substrate/frame/revive/uapi/src/precompiles/vesting.rs`**: Binds
    the Solidity interface via `alloy_core::sol!`
    - **`substrate/frame/revive/precompiles/`**: New crate implementing the
    `Precompile` trait — dispatches `vest`/`vestOther` through
    `pallet_vesting` and queries locked balances via `VestingSchedule`
    - **`substrate/frame/revive/src/tests.rs`**: Trailing comma fix in
    `construct_runtime!`

    ## Test plan
    - [x] New vesting precompile tests pass (`vest`, `vestOther`,
    `vestingBalance`, `vestingBalanceOf`)
    - [x] Existing pallet-revive tests unaffected

    ---------

    Co-authored-by: cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: PG Herveou <pgherveou@gmail.com>

commit 5fbeadd
Author: Dhiraj Sah <dhiraj@parity.io>
Date:   Thu Apr 2 17:35:52 2026 +0530

    fix(pallet-multi-asset-bounties): use non-destructive read in calculate_payout() (#11425)

    ## Description

    `calculate_payout()` in `pallet-multi-asset-bounties` uses
    `ChildBountiesValuePerParent::take()` — a destructive read that deletes
    the storage entry — instead of `get()`. Since `calculate_payout()` is
    called from multiple code paths, the `take()` causes incorrect behavior
    on subsequent calls.

    `calculate_payout()` is called from two places:

    1. `do_process_payout_payment()` (lib.rs:1736) — invoked by
    `award_bounty()` and `retry_payment()`
    2. `do_check_payout_payment_status()` (lib.rs:1771) — invoked by
    `check_status()` on payment success

    When a parent bounty with child bounties is awarded:

    - The **first call** (from `award_bounty()`) reads
    `ChildBountiesValuePerParent` via `take()`, correctly computing
    `parent_value - children_value`, but **deletes the storage entry** as a
    side effect.
    - The **second call** (from `check_status()` on success) reads the
    now-deleted storage, gets `0`, and emits `BountyPayoutProcessed` with
    `value: parent_value` instead of the correct `value: parent_value -
    children_value`.

    Additionally, if a non-synchronous `Paymaster` implementation is used
    where `check_payment()` can return `Failure`, the `retry_payment()` path
    would call `calculate_payout()` again on the deleted storage, attempting
    to pay the full parent value instead of the reduced amount.

    ## Integration

    No integration changes required for downstream projects. This is a
    bugfix internal to `pallet-multi-asset-bounties` with no changes to
    public APIs, storage layout, or trait definitions.

    ## Review Notes

    Three changes were made:

    ### 1. `calculate_payout()` — `take()` replaced with `get()`

    ```diff
    - let children_value = ChildBountiesValuePerParent::<T, I>::take(parent_bounty_id);
    + let children_value = ChildBountiesValuePerParent::<T, I>::get(parent_bounty_id);
    ```

    This makes `calculate_payout()` idempotent — safe to call multiple times
    for the same bounty.

    ### 2. `remove_bounty()` — explicit storage cleanup added

    ```diff
      None => {
          Bounties::<T, I>::remove(parent_bounty_id);
          ChildBountiesPerParent::<T, I>::remove(parent_bounty_id);
          TotalChildBountiesPerParent::<T, I>::remove(parent_bounty_id);
    -     debug_assert!(ChildBountiesValuePerParent::<T, I>::get(parent_bounty_id).is_zero());
    +     ChildBountiesValuePerParent::<T, I>::remove(parent_bounty_id);
      },
    ```

    The `debug_assert!` was removed because it was not a true invariant — it
    only passed because `take()` had already deleted the value. When child
    bounties are paid out, `ChildBountiesValuePerParent` remains non-zero
    until parent bounty cleanup.

    ### 3. Test updated

    Added an event assertion to the existing `check_status_works` test to
    verify `BountyPayoutProcessed` emits the correct net payout value
    (`parent_value - child_value`) instead of the full parent value. This
    assertion fails with `take()` and passes with `get()`.

    ### Impact

    - **Current deployments (KAH, PAH)**: Both use `LocalPay` where
    `check_payment()` always returns `Success`. The retry/lock path is
    unreachable, but the `BountyPayoutProcessed` event emits an incorrect
    payout value for parent bounties with child bounties.
    - **Future deployments**: If the pallet is configured with an async
    `Paymaster` (e.g., XCM-based) where `check_payment()` can return
    `Failure`, the `retry_payment()` path would compute a wrong payout
    amount, potentially leading to permanent fund lock with no recovery path
    (since `close_bounty()` rejects `PayoutAttempted` status).

    ---------

    Co-authored-by: cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

commit e3865cf
Author: Rodrigo Quelhas <22591718+RomarQ@users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 2 10:41:38 2026 +0100

    Deprecate `ValidateUnsigned` trait and `#[pallet::validate_unsigned]` attribute (#10150)

    Part of #2415
    Closes #2436

    Related: #6325 #6326

    ## Summary

    Deprecates the `ValidateUnsigned` trait and
    `#[pallet::validate_unsigned]` attribute in favor of the new
    `TransactionExtension` API. This is a non-breaking change that adds
    deprecation warnings to guide users toward the modern transaction
    validation approach.

    ## Motivation

    The `ValidateUnsigned` trait was the legacy approach for validating
    unsigned transactions in FRAME pallets. The newer `TransactionExtension`
    trait provides a more flexible and composable way to handle transaction
    validation, including both signed and unsigned transactions.

    ## Changes

    ### Deprecated APIs
    - ✅ Added `#[deprecated]` attribute to `ValidateUnsigned` trait
    - ✅ Added deprecation warning to `#[pallet::validate_unsigned]` macro
    attribute

    ### Migration (Using `TransactionExtensions`)

    https://paritytech.github.io/polkadot-sdk/master/polkadot_sdk_docs/reference_docs/transaction_extensions

    ## Impact

    - **Non-breaking:** Existing code continues to work with deprecation
    warnings
    - **Compiler warnings:** Users will see deprecation notices guiding them
    to migrate
    - **Timeline:** Full removal planned for a future major release (TBD)

    ## Review Notes

    - The `#[pallet::validate_unsigned]` deprecation warning might be
    redundant since it's always used together with `ValidateUnsigned`, but
    both are included for completeness and clarity.

    ## Follow-up Tasks

    The following pallets and crates need to be migrated to
    `TransactionExtension` in subsequent PRs:

    **Runtime crates:**
    - [ ] `polkadot-runtime-common`
    - [ ] `polkadot-runtime-parachains`

    **FRAME pallets:**
    - [ ] `pallet-babe`
    - [ ] `pallet-beefy`
    - [ ] `pallet-election-provider-multi-block`
    - [ ] `pallet-grandpa`
    - [x] `pallet-im-online`
    #11235
    - [x] `pallet-mixnet`
    #11010

    **Core:**
    - [ ] `frame-executive`
    - [ ] `frame-system`

    **Examples:**
    - [x] `pallet-example-offchain-worker`
    #10716

    **Testing:**
    - [ ] `substrate-test-runtime`

    ## Open Question

    Should we remove the `ValidateUnsigned` bound from the type parameter
    `V` in the `Applyable` trait?

    ---------

    Co-authored-by: Guillaume Thiolliere <guillaume.thiolliere@parity.io>
    Co-authored-by: Shawn Tabrizi <shawntabrizi@gmail.com>
    Co-authored-by: Branislav Kontur <bkontur@gmail.com>

commit 5c97c0f
Author: clangenb <37865735+clangenb@users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 2 01:06:59 2026 +0200

    [Penpal] fix genesis presets - assign proper ED to accounts (#11575)

    Penpal had values below the ED for initializing asset balances for some
    accounts. This has not been detected as no unit tests actually use the
    presets. This PR fixes the invalid values, and it also adds some unit
    tests for validating that the presets build at least.

    Closes #11558.

    ---------

    Co-authored-by: clangenb <clangenb@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

commit 59c4053
Author: Egor_P <egor@parity.io>
Date:   Wed Apr 1 20:29:31 2026 +0200

    [Release|CI/CD] Fixes for release flows (#11578)

    This PR backports few fixes for soem release flows, that were made in
    stable2603 branch. In particular:
    - Fixed resume check in Crates Publish flow
    - Fixed missing llvm path on macos builds
    - Fixed scrtipt that reverts path deps in Cargo.toml files
    - Bumped parity-publish version
    - Fixed check if the post-crates-release branch exists in Crateds
    Publish flow

    ---------

    Co-authored-by: BDevParity <bruno.devic@parity.io>

commit e9e4769
Author: DenzelPenzel <15388928+DenzelPenzel@users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 1 14:11:28 2026 +0100

    Add statement store e2e integration tests (#11237)

    # Description

    #10783

    E2E Integration Tests (zombienet-sdk)

    Functional tests (statement_store)
    - statement_store_genesis_inject — submit + subscribe round-trip with
    genesis-injected allowances, 2-node propagation with data
    integrity verification
    - statement_store_sudo_allowance — sudo-based runtime allowance setting,
    8 concurrent multi-account submissions, 4-node fan-out propagation

    ### Test Infrastructure
    - common.rs — shared helpers: create_test_statement, submit_statement,
    expect_one_statement, expect_statements_unordered,
    subscribe_topic, spawn_network, spawn_network_sudo
    - sc_statement_store::subxt_client — custom subxt config (CustomConfig)
    for non-standard transaction extensions
    (VerifyMultiSignature, RestrictOrigins), set_allowances_via_sudo for
    runtime-configured networks
    - sc_statement_store::test_utils — shared keypair generation and
    allowance storage item builders (get_keypair,
    create_allowance_items, create_uniform_allowance_items)
    - CI matrix registration for all statement store test groups

    ### What we cover in this PR

    Test(statement_store_sudo_allowance) cover the next options for #11534 :
    - Propagation under normal load: Zombienet tests to cover concurrent
    multi-client corner cases and verify statements reach all real nodes,
    NOT including during major sync

    ---------

    Co-authored-by: cmd[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

commit a41bb09
Author: Javier Viola <363911+pepoviola@users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 1 14:34:27 2026 +0200

    [zombienet] typo in preflight (#11602)

    Typo in the preflight logic was merged by accident.
    Thx!

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Vasile <alexandru.vasile@parity.io>
@0xRVE
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

0xRVE commented Apr 3, 2026

Please don't force push to a PR which has already been posted, especially not when it has been reviewed

Understood. I force-pushed to remove the latest commit, but I will avoid doing that on reviewed PRs going forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A5-run-CI Run CI on draft PR I5-enhancement An additional feature request. T7-smart_contracts This PR/Issue is related to smart contracts.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants