refactor: use BundleBuilder as a state builder

[tcoratger]

Closes #4614

Acts as a follow up of #8264 after the most recent changes.

cc @mattsse

[mattsse]

ty!
a few cosmetic nits.

this is a bit delicate, so I'd appreciate another review by @rkrasiuk and @rakita

[mattsse]

looks like setter functions that take &mut self would be useful on bundlebuilder

[tcoratger]

Done here bluealloy/revm#1527

[quentinv72]

@tcoratger Just curious why this PR was created? #8264 is still up-to-date.

[mattsse]

@quentinv72 I think this was my bad...

thanks for updating, I'll ensure it is properly reviewed this time...

[mattsse]

@rkrasiuk idk what to do here

should we proceed with this or #8264

[tcoratger]

@rkrasiuk idk what to do here

should we proceed with this or #8264

I think you can even simplify some part with the recent updates of revm, including bluealloy/revm#1527

Let me know if we can merge this or not and I have ideas of a follow up so as not to disorganize things here.

[emhane]

blocked by #8264

[tcoratger]

blocked by #8264

This is an equivalent one no @mattsse? following #8264 (comment) it seems that #8264 will be staled no?

[emhane]

I'd like to merge the other branch first, since you used it as base, so that the commits go to the author. good open source practice is to use git remote add <repo> to pull the other persons fork, then use git cherry-pick to bring in their changes.