Skip to content

Conversation

@petergardfjall
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses #731.

In the current formulation of the conan spec the presence of namespace is optional.

The testcases removed in this PR therefore make no sense.

@petergardfjall petergardfjall changed the title remove 'invalid conan purl only namespace' remove 'invalid conan purl only namespace' testcases Nov 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@mjherzog mjherzog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These test cases are wrong as stated - namespace is optional and therefore allowed for a conan PURL type

@TG1999
Copy link
Contributor

TG1999 commented Nov 6, 2025

@petergardfjall thanks for the PR! this still not fixes #731

This test needs to be removed as well, thanks!

"description": "invalid conan purl only channel qualifier",

@petergardfjall
Copy link
Contributor Author

@petergardfjall thanks for the PR! this still not fixes #731

This test needs to be removed as well, thanks!

"description": "invalid conan purl only channel qualifier",

That's taken care of in a separate pr: #734

@petergardfjall
Copy link
Contributor Author

Anything preventing this from being merged?

@mjherzog
Copy link
Member

mjherzog commented Dec 3, 2025

Merging with 2 reviews

@mjherzog mjherzog merged commit ceeea42 into package-url:main Dec 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants