Skip to content

refactor(linter): move expect-expect rule to shared and create own rule for vitest#18630

Open
Sysix wants to merge 1 commit into01-26-refactor_linter_move_consistent-test-it_rule_to_shared_and_crate_own_rule_for_vitest_from
01-27-refactor_linter_move_expect-expect_rule_to_shared_and_create_own_rule_for_vitest_
Open

refactor(linter): move expect-expect rule to shared and create own rule for vitest#18630
Sysix wants to merge 1 commit into01-26-refactor_linter_move_consistent-test-it_rule_to_shared_and_crate_own_rule_for_vitest_from
01-27-refactor_linter_move_expect-expect_rule_to_shared_and_create_own_rule_for_vitest_

Conversation

@Sysix
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Sysix Sysix commented Jan 27, 2026

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Sysix commented Jan 27, 2026

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent changes, fast-track this PR to the front of the merge queue

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior labels Jan 27, 2026
@Sysix Sysix force-pushed the 01-27-refactor_linter_move_expect-expect_rule_to_shared_and_create_own_rule_for_vitest_ branch from 18231b9 to 116fe9c Compare January 27, 2026 15:35
@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-cli Area - CLI label Jan 27, 2026
@Sysix Sysix marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2026 15:38
@Sysix Sysix requested a review from camc314 as a code owner January 27, 2026 15:38
@Sysix Sysix force-pushed the 01-26-refactor_linter_move_consistent-test-it_rule_to_shared_and_crate_own_rule_for_vitest_ branch from 9090516 to 0887dc7 Compare March 6, 2026 14:18
@Sysix Sysix force-pushed the 01-27-refactor_linter_move_expect-expect_rule_to_shared_and_create_own_rule_for_vitest_ branch from 116fe9c to 4daa398 Compare March 6, 2026 14:18
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

🎉 Hooray! codspeed-rust just leveled up to 4.4.1!

A heads-up, this is a breaking change and it might affect your current performance baseline a bit. But here's the exciting part - it's packed with new, cool features and promises improved result stability 🥳!
Curious about what's new? Visit our releases page to delve into all the awesome details about this new version.

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 52 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing 01-27-refactor_linter_move_expect-expect_rule_to_shared_and_create_own_rule_for_vitest_ (be096be) with 01-26-refactor_linter_move_consistent-test-it_rule_to_shared_and_crate_own_rule_for_vitest_ (b977eba)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 52 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on 01-26-refactor_linter_move_consistent-test-it_rule_to_shared_and_crate_own_rule_for_vitest_ (3b9dc66) during the generation of this report, so 0dba69a was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@Sysix Sysix force-pushed the 01-27-refactor_linter_move_expect-expect_rule_to_shared_and_create_own_rule_for_vitest_ branch from 4daa398 to 1faac10 Compare March 6, 2026 14:42
@Sysix Sysix force-pushed the 01-26-refactor_linter_move_consistent-test-it_rule_to_shared_and_crate_own_rule_for_vitest_ branch from 0887dc7 to b977eba Compare March 6, 2026 14:42
@Sysix Sysix force-pushed the 01-27-refactor_linter_move_expect-expect_rule_to_shared_and_create_own_rule_for_vitest_ branch 2 times, most recently from b93680f to cf9ff1d Compare March 6, 2026 15:11
@Sysix Sysix force-pushed the 01-27-refactor_linter_move_expect-expect_rule_to_shared_and_create_own_rule_for_vitest_ branch from cf9ff1d to be096be Compare March 16, 2026 19:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-cli Area - CLI A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant