fix(formatter): merge the right side of LogicalExpression if it's a LogicalExpression and both have the same operator

[Dunqing]

I wrote the implementation, and it isn't a port from anywhere. This is to align with Prettier's unbalancing LogicalExpression behavior.

We can't use the same approach that Prettier does because our AST isn't mutable, so we have to do the same thing in the formatting phase, which makes the code a little hard to understand. However, our own is more performant.

[Dunqing]

• fix(formatter): correct comments checking for some places #14153
• fix(formatter): print comments incorrectly if the node is without following a node #14110
• fix(formatter): merge the right side of LogicalExpression if it's a LogicalExpression and both have the same operator #14097 👈 (View in Graphite)
• feat(formatter): correct printing parameters with return_type for function-like node #14084
• feat(formatter): normalize key of TSPropertySignature #14083
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments within the type annotation of ArrayPattern and ObjectPattern #14077
• fix(formatter): correct printing comments around decorators #14076
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #14097 will not alter performance

_{Comparing 09-25-fix_formatter_merge_the_right_side_of_logicalexpression_if_it_s_a_logicalexpression_and_both_have_the_same_operator (ed33fad) with main (cb29117)¹}

Summary

✅ 33 untouched
⏩ 4 skipped²

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (2b2c345) during the generation of this report, so cb29117 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[graphite-app]

Merge activity

• Sep 29, 9:42 AM UTC: leaysgur added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Sep 29, 9:53 AM UTC: The Graphite merge queue removed this pull request due to downstack failures on PR #14083.
• Sep 29, 9:53 AM UTC: The Graphite merge queue removed this pull request due to downstack failures on PR #14083.
• Sep 29, 1:34 PM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Sep 29, 1:34 PM UTC: leaysgur added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Sep 29, 1:43 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.