Skip to content

Comments

refactor(transformer/object-rest-spread): extract unboxed field earlier#12717

Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
08-01-refactor_transformer_object-rest-spread_extract_unboxed_field_earlier
Aug 1, 2025
Merged

refactor(transformer/object-rest-spread): extract unboxed field earlier#12717
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
08-01-refactor_transformer_object-rest-spread_extract_unboxed_field_earlier

Conversation

@overlookmotel
Copy link
Member

@overlookmotel overlookmotel commented Aug 1, 2025

Pure refactor. Follow-on after #12698.

We only need the target field, so no need bring the whole of AssignmentTargetRest onto the stack. Possibly compiler will have optimized this already, but better to be explicit and make it easier for compiler to apply the optimization.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-transformer Area - Transformer / Transpiler C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior labels Aug 1, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

overlookmotel commented Aug 1, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Aug 1, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #12717 will not alter performance

Comparing 08-01-refactor_transformer_object-rest-spread_extract_unboxed_field_earlier (5c9fdd2) with 08-01-refactor_parser_shorten_astbuilder_calls (8a27974)

Summary

✅ 34 untouched benchmarks

@overlookmotel overlookmotel marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2025 10:42
@overlookmotel overlookmotel requested a review from Dunqing as a code owner August 1, 2025 10:42
Copy link
Member

@Dunqing Dunqing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've noticed this before, but Boshen merged that PR so quickly.

@Dunqing Dunqing added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Aug 1, 2025
Copy link
Member

Dunqing commented Aug 1, 2025

Merge activity

…er (#12717)

Pure refactor. Follow-on after #12698.

We only need the `target` field, so no need bring the whole of `AssignmentTargetRest` onto the stack. Possibly compiler will have optimized this already, but better to be explicit and make it easier for compiler to apply the optimization.
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 08-01-refactor_parser_shorten_astbuilder_calls branch from f7a5f41 to 8a27974 Compare August 1, 2025 11:08
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 08-01-refactor_transformer_object-rest-spread_extract_unboxed_field_earlier branch from 8910d94 to 5c9fdd2 Compare August 1, 2025 11:08
Base automatically changed from 08-01-refactor_parser_shorten_astbuilder_calls to main August 1, 2025 11:16
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Aug 1, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 5c9fdd2 into main Aug 1, 2025
25 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 08-01-refactor_transformer_object-rest-spread_extract_unboxed_field_earlier branch August 1, 2025 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-transformer Area - Transformer / Transpiler C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants