fix(parser): fix parsing repeated static in class field

[magic-akari]

• Fix: Issue parsing repeated static in class field #10942

This is a syntax error and should not parse.

class A {static static static(){}}

[graphite-app]

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #11010 will not alter performance

_{Comparing magic-akari:fix/issue-10942 (a1f4757) with main (4c9a9b3)}

Summary

✅ 36 untouched benchmarks

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes the parser behavior to correctly terminate modifier parsing at a newline, preventing duplicate recognition of the static keyword. Key changes include:

• Updating the static keyword check in the parser.
• Adjusting tests in both the minifier and codegen integration tests to reflect the new behavior.
• Commenting out an incorrect test case in the minifier tests.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
crates/oxc_parser/src/js/class.rs	Updated the condition to avoid processing duplicate static keywords.
crates/oxc_minifier/src/peephole/substitute_alternate_syntax.rs	Commented out a test case for duplicated static keywords with an explanatory note.
crates/oxc_codegen/tests/integration/unit.rs	Added a test case to verify the new parsing logic with multiple static keywords.
crates/oxc_codegen/tests/integration/ts.rs	Introduced a similar test case for TypeScript integration to confirm consistent behavior.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

crates/oxc_parser/src/js/class.rs:212

• The updated condition prevents processing a duplicate 'static' keyword by verifying that r#static is not already set, which fixes the unintended parsing behavior. Please confirm that this logic properly aligns with the intended parsing rules for class elements.

if !r#static && self.at(Kind::Static) {