-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CPU][ARM64] Added Greater JIT emitter (#24421) #25046
Conversation
Added support and unit test for Greater jit emitter
48ccbd1
to
65778f6
Compare
I'm somewhat confused by some of the checks failing. I'm currently running |
@eshoguli gentle reminder this PR is still open. Any feedback on the general approach? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution.
Can you, please, update ActivationLayerCPUTest::generate_inputs
to cover Greater
emitter functionality. There is an example for Sign
activation. You can do something similar but use more then one value, please:
- Two input tensor values should be different: less, equal and greater.
- Please, update to have special values: negative zero, NaN (several values), Infinity values, ... in test input tensor.
src/plugins/intel_cpu/src/nodes/kernels/aarch64/jit_uni_eltwise_generic.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This PR will be closed in a week because of 2 weeks of no activity. |
build_jenkins |
build_jenkins |
Hey @jvr0123! I see some Ci failures caused by this PR. Could you please fix them? |
This PR will be closed in a week because of 2 weeks of no activity. |
hey @jvr0123 please update a status of the PR - will you have time to finish it? |
This PR will be closed in a week because of 2 weeks of no activity. |
This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 2 week with no activity. |
Details:
Tickets: